2021
DOI: 10.1080/23808985.2021.1960180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gendered citation practices in the field of communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
7

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
45
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…References. Recent work in several fields of science has identified a bias in citation practices such that papers from women and other minority scholars are undercited relative to the number of such papers in the field [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69] . Here we sought to proactively consider choosing references that reflect the diversity of the field in thought, form of contribution, gender, race, ethnicity, and other factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References. Recent work in several fields of science has identified a bias in citation practices such that papers from women and other minority scholars are undercited relative to the number of such papers in the field [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69] . Here we sought to proactively consider choosing references that reflect the diversity of the field in thought, form of contribution, gender, race, ethnicity, and other factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work in several fields of science has identified a bias in citation practices such that papers from women and other minority scholars are undercited relative to the number of such papers in the field ( Maliniak et al, 2013 ; Mitchell et al, 2013 ; Caplar et al, 2017 ; Dion et al, 2018 ; Bertolero et al, 2020 ; Dworkin et al, 2020 ; Chatterjee and Werner, 2021 ; Fulvio et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2021 ). Here, we sought to proactively consider choosing references that reflect the diversity of the field in thought, form of contribution, gender, race, ethnicity, and other factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work in several fields of science-including physics and biology, where our work here is situated [42][43][44][45][46]-has identified a bias in citation practices such that papers from women and other minority scholars are under-cited relative to the number of such papers in the field [47][48][49][50][51]. Here we sought to proactively consider choosing references that reflect the diversity of the field in thought, form of contribution, gender, race, ethnicity, and other factors.…”
Section: Citation Diversity Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%