This paper explores how gender and class shape the constructions, perceptions and experiences of career success for three senior female academics, all of whom come from a white, working class background, paying attention to whether they reported any 'price' for their academic success. The paper is divided into four sections; first, there is a brief overview of what is known about working class women's experiences of higher education. Second, the paper outlines the methodological approach informing this research. Third, the paper explores the complexity of success. Fourth, some of the costs that my respondents have paid for their career success are discussed.© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Working class women and higher educationSince the Second World War the number of female students participating in HE and moving on to work in HE in the UK has gradually increased (Coats, 1994). This increase centres around three factors; first, policy changes, such as the 1944 Education Act, which allowed some working class girls access to an academic school curriculum via the eleven plus examination (Matheson & Grosvenor, 1999). Second, the expansion of HE during the 1960s created additional capacity (Brooks, 1997). Third, the demands of the post war economy, where "the growth of white-collar and professional occupations required the recruitment of female labour" contributed to the increase of female participation in HE (Brooks, 1997: 16). These three factors were circumscribed to some extent by dominant gendered discourses which prescribed some academic disciplines (e.g. education and nursing) and forms of employment (e.g. secretary, teacher and nurse) as more compatible with femininity and other disciplines (e.g. law and natural sciences) and professions (e.g. lawyer, pharmacist and physician) as less so. In explaining the increasing participation of females in higher education in the post Second World War period, Deem (1995: 31) points out that; changes in the education of women since 1944 have usually been accompanied by changes in general social policy, and those changes have been closely linked to the needs of the economy and to prevailing ideologies about women's role in society.To accommodate these changes the state at that time emphasised a 'dual role' for women, encompassing paid work and family commitments (Deem, 1995) and consequently "encouraged women into education and training" (Brooks, 1997:16). State welfare provisions were increasingly made available (for example childcare) thus enabling women to participate more fully in the labour market, albeit in segregated sectors. As a result, the 1960s saw an upsurge in women students' entry to universities (Brooks, 1997: 16).Yet in the UK by 1989, women still only made up 25% of the cohort attending university (Coats, 1994). Delamont (2006: 179) asserts that "women are newcomers in higher education". In the mid 1990s Acker (1994: 125) noted that, Women are a minority […] among full time teachers and researchers in UK universities and better represented...