Gender, Victimization, and Commercial Sex: A Comparative Study

Abstract

Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit.Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l

Early Assessment of Integrated Knowledge Translation Efforts to Mobilize Sex Workers in Their Communities

“…The PCEPA also makes it illegal for workers to communicate their services in a public place next to a school ground, playground, or daycare center, having greater negative impact on more economically disadvantaged sex workers, including Indigenous and transgender sex workers, and those with problematic substance use (Benoit et al, 2009 ; Canadian Public Health Association, 2014 ; Krusi et al, 2012 ; Kunimoto, 2018 ; Lyons et al, 2017 ; Orchard, Farr, Macphail, Wender, & Young, 2012 ). In essence, the PCEPA is one of the most extensive instruments of criminalization globally (O’Doherty & Waters, 2019 ), and leaves sex workers in a precarious victim-criminal position (Majic, 2014 ).…”

COVID-19, Stigma, and the Ongoing Marginalization of Sex Workers and their Support Organizations

“…In a recent study, two-thirds said in the last 12 months, they received free food or meals, half of the respondents disclosed that they borrowed money from friends or family to help meet bill payments and one-third said they had not paid the full amount of their rent or mortgage, or the full amount for utilities (Benoit et al, 2020b ). Finally, marginalization of sex workers as a group is evident by their high rates of assault and victimization compared to the general population (Bungay & Guta, 2018 ; Comack & Seshia, 2010 ; Deering et al, 2014 ; O'Doherty & Waters, 2019 ).…”