Gender Trouble in Social Psychology: How Can Butler’s Work Inform Experimental Social Psychologists’ Conceptualization of Gender?

Abstract

A quarter of a century ago, philosopher Judith Butler (1990) called upon society to create “gender trouble” by disrupting the binary view of sex, gender, and sexuality. She argued that gender, rather than being an essential quality following from biological sex, or an inherent identity, is an act which grows out of, reinforces, and is reinforced by, societal norms and creates the illusion of binary sex. Despite the fact that Butler’s philosophical approach to understanding gender has many resonances with a large body of gender research being conducted by social psychologists, little theorizing and research within experimental social psychology has drawn directly on Butler’s ideas. In this paper, we will discuss how Butler’s ideas can add to experimental social psychologists’ understanding of gender. We describe the Butler’s ideas from Gender Trouble and discuss the ways in which they fit with current conceptualizations of gender in experimental social psychology. We then propose a series of new research questions that arise from this integration of Butler’s work and the social psychological literature. Finally, we suggest a number of concrete ways in which experimental social psychologists can incorporate notions of gender performativity and gender trouble into the ways in which they research gender.

Four Dimensions of Criticism Against Gender-Fair Language

“…For example, past research has shown that people with a strong female or male gender identity are more negative toward hen and use hen less often (Gustafsson Sendén et al 2015). Challenging social gender identities by introducing a genderneutral pronoun may be difficult for people and lead to harsh reactions (Morgenroth and Ryan 2018). Arguments that diminish the issue and its proponents may therefore be based on a person's perceived threat of their own social identity.…”

The Effects of Gender Trouble: An Integrative Theoretical Framework of the Perpetuation and Disruption of the Gender/Sex Binary

“…Integrative Theoretical Framework of the Perpetuation and Disruption of the Gender/Sex Binary Nagoshi, Cloud, Lindley, Nagoshi, & Lothamer, 2019; see also Ansara & Hegarty, 2014;Morgenroth & Ryan, 2018). This absence seems somewhat surprising given the field's interest in gender/sex more broadly-and in particular social psychology's interest in inequality, intergroup relations, and social change.…”

Gender Essentialism and the Mental Representation of Transgender Women and Men: A Multimethod Investigation of Stereotype Content

“…In Western societies today, a strong cultural model of binary gender holds that all infants are defined as female or male at birth, and will grow up identifying (respectively) as women or men while taking on societal roles considered appropriate to their group (Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, & van Anders, 2019;Morgenroth & Ryan, 2018) 1 . Women and men who fit this default pattern are so normative that a term to describe these groups -cisgender -was only added to the Oxford English Dictionary in 2013, and these groups are still less frequently marked than transgender groups (see Figure 1).…”