Gender Stereotyping in Domestic Violence Cases. An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence

Peroni, Lourdes; Timmer, Alexandra

doi:10.1017/9781780685458.003

Cited by 26 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Bunun dışında bu kullanımın başvuru sürecinde benzer hak talepleri arasında bir öncelik sırası belirlemede rol oynadığı ve bilhassa devletin pozitif edimlerini açık etmek bakımından iş gördüğü belirtilmiştir 58 . Kırılganlık kullanımının iş gördüğü düşünülen bir diğer nokta da kavramın formel eşitliğin ötesine geçebilmesi ve maddi eşitliliği sağlamakta daha başarılı olmasıdır 59 .…”

Section: Partiküler Ve Grup Odaklı Bir Kırılganlıkunclassified

İnsan Haklari Bakimindan Kirilgan Kavramina Bi̇r Gi̇ri̇ş Ve Kavramin Ai̇hm Kararlarindaki̇ Görünürlüğü

Çelik

2020

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Son yılların etik ve politik tartışmaları dahilinde ön plana çıkan kavramlarından biri de kırılganlıktır. Kavramı hukuk ve insan hakları hukuku özelinde değerlendirmek ise oldukça yeni bir teşebbüstür. Bu çalışma, kavramın hukuk ve insan hakları hukuku ile ilişkisini ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Bunu yaparken, kavram etrafında dönen mevcut tartışmalar esas alınarak, öncelikle kavramın evrensel-ontolojik ve grup bazlı yaklaşımları tartışma konusu edinilecektir. Bu ayrımın yarattığı farkı da dikkate alan genel bir bakışın ardından, kavramın insan hakları hukuku literatüründe nasıl karşılık bulduğu konu edinilecektir. Son olarak kavramın yargılamalar bakımından oynadığı rol, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesinden örneklerle somutlaştırılacak ve bu kullanımın etkinliğine dair bir değerlendirme yapılacaktır.

show abstract

Section: Partiküler Ve Grup Odaklı Bir Kırılganlıkunclassified

İnsan Haklari Bakimindan Kirilgan Kavramina Bi̇r Gi̇ri̇ş Ve Kavramin Ai̇hm Kararlarindaki̇ Görünürlüğü

Çelik

2020

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To stanowisko przemawia za możliwością przyjęcia, że każda osoba wnioskująca o azyl, niezależnie od jej osobistych doświadczeń, jest uznana za wrażliwą . Tym samym wrażliwość, która jest immanentnie wpisana w daną sytuację społeczną, powoduje, że staje się przesłanką do przypisania takiej wrażliwości wobec całej wyróżnionej grupy osób 29 . Z drugiej zaś strony, afiliacja jednostki z konkretną grupą powoduje, że rozważenia wymaga, czy jednostka ta nie zasługuje na szczególne traktowanie .…”

Section: Grupy Wrażliwe Społecznieunclassified

Grupa jednostek jako podmiot poszukujący ochrony w postępowaniu przed ETPC. Koncepcja ochrony praw grup wrażliwych

Domańska

2019

Studia Prawnicze / the Legal Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Artykuł 34 EKPC określa kryteria dopuszczalności wniesienia przez jednostkę skargi do Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka, ale stanowi również, że skarga może być wniesiona przez grupę jednostek, które twierdzą, że są ofiarą naruszenia praw zawartych w Konwencji lub w jednym z Protokołów do Konwencji. Celem artykułu jest analiza orzecznictwa Trybunału, które potwierdza, że ochrona praw grup jednostek może również wynikać z orzeczenia Trybunału wydanego w indywidualnej sprawie, jeżeli tylko wnioskodawca udowodni, że jest członkiem danej grupy wrażliwej i cała grupa wymaga przyznania takiej samej ochrony. Ważne jest, aby wrażliwa grupa i jej członkowie byli identyfikowani przez pryzmat charakterystycznych kryteriów oraz wspólnych okoliczności, w których ich prawa zostały naruszone.

show abstract

“…This is particularly the case given that the ECtHR is a regional instrument and the CRPD is a UN instrument, which further reinforces the remarks made about fragmentation versus integration in Section 2 above. 67, where the ECtHR remarked as follows: 'The Court has consistently held that it takes into account relevant international instruments and reports in order to interpret the guarantees of the Convention and to establish whether there is a common standard in the field. It is for the Court to decide which international instruments and reports it considers relevant and how much weight to attribute to them'.…”

Section: The Margin Of Appreciation Doctrine In the Jurisprudence Of mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lourdes Peroni and Alexandra Timmer are of the opinion that the Court's use of the notion of group vulnerability 'represents a crucial step towards an enhanced anti-discrimination case law and a more robust idea of equality'. 67 In Z.H., the Court used the vulnerability approach to read into Article 3 ECHR an obligation to take 'reasonable steps' to prevent situations likely to result in inhuman and degrading treatment. 68 The notion of 'reasonable steps' was likened to that of 'reasonable accommodation' in Articles 2, 13 and 14 of the CRPD 69 and, therefore, would appear to signify that the Court is building a bridge towards CRPD-type reasonable accommodation duties.…”

Section: Post-crpd Case Law On Articles 2 and 3 Echrmentioning

confidence: 99%

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the European Convention on Human Rights: a tale of two halves or a potentially unified vision of human rights?

Broderick

2018

CILJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The traditional dichotomy of rights between civil and political rights, on the one hand, and economic, social and cultural rights, on the other hand, has been increasingly eroded in scholarly and judicial discourse. The interdependence of the two sets of rights is a fundamental tenet of international human rights law. Nowhere is this interdependence more evident than in the context of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD or UN Convention). This article examines the indivisibility and interdependence of rights in the CRPD and, specifically, the positive obligations imposed on States Parties to the UN Convention, in particular the reasonable accommodation duty. The aim of the paper is to analyse, from a disability perspective, the approach adopted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or ‘Strasbourg Court’) in developing the social dimension of certain civil and political rights in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), namely Articles 2 and 3 (on the right to life and the prohibition on torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, respectively), Article 8 (on the right to private and family life) and Article 14 ECHR (on non-discrimination). Ultimately, this paper examines the influence of the CRPD on the interpretation by the Strasbourg Court of the rights of persons with disabilities under the ECHR. It argues that, while the Court is building some bridges to the CRPD, the incremental and often fragmented approach adopted by the Court could be moulded into a more principled approach, guided by the CRPD.

show abstract

Gender Stereotyping in Domestic Violence Cases. An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence

Cited by 26 publications

References 0 publications

İnsan Haklari Bakimindan Kirilgan Kavramina Bi̇r Gi̇ri̇ş Ve Kavramin Ai̇hm Kararlarindaki̇ Görünürlüğü

İnsan Haklari Bakimindan Kirilgan Kavramina Bi̇r Gi̇ri̇ş Ve Kavramin Ai̇hm Kararlarindaki̇ Görünürlüğü

Grupa jednostek jako podmiot poszukujący ochrony w postępowaniu przed ETPC. Koncepcja ochrony praw grup wrażliwych

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the European Convention on Human Rights: a tale of two halves or a potentially unified vision of human rights?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About