2001
DOI: 10.2307/449275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, Scientific Knowledge, and Attitudes toward the Environment: A Cross-National Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
54
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
54
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender is, for example, significant in five of the analyses, and as seen earlier, women show a higher level of environmental concern than men in these cases (cp. Hayes, 2001), with the exception of financial sacrifices, which on the other hand might support Van Liere and Dunlap's hypothesis from 1980.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gender is, for example, significant in five of the analyses, and as seen earlier, women show a higher level of environmental concern than men in these cases (cp. Hayes, 2001), with the exception of financial sacrifices, which on the other hand might support Van Liere and Dunlap's hypothesis from 1980.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…3 Hayes (2001), using ISSP data about environmental concern from 1993, shows that gender does not explain environmental concern and she confirms the conclusion from earlier studies that there are no clear-cut relationships between gender and environmental attitudes. However, even though there are few significant results regarding the impact of gender in the cross-national analysis, the results for two of the studied countries, the USA and Norway (Sweden was not part of this fielding), indicate that in some countries gender might influence attitudes (women are 5 particular behaviour (Engel & Pötschke, 1998).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…The control variables we use here are selected from the VOLCROWE survey in accordance with numerous empirical studies across a range of, mostly, but not exclusively Anglo-American populations, which have revealed factors which correlate with science knowledge [Day and Devlin, 1998;Hayes and Tariq, 2000;Bak, 2001;Sherkat, 2011;Hayes, 2001;von Roten, 2004;Sturgis and Allum, 2004;Gauchat, 2011]. These control variables are gender, age, ethnicity, community type (specifically rural or urban), educational level (as measured by ISCED categories) and if the highest qualification is in science and extent to which respondent agrees that religion is important in their life (on a Likert scale).…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have been able to locate only one study in which the authors found no gender differences in relation to environmental issues. In a study drawing on nationally representative survey data from Great Britain, Norway, The Netherlands, Germany, Japan, and the United States, Hayes (2001) [40] pointed out to the little or non-existent gender differences in attitudes towards the environment notwithstanding the major levels of scientific knowledge held by men. We found, however, several works in which the authors provide a more nuanced picture of these relations.…”
Section: Gender and Environmental Attitude: An Inconclusive Debatementioning
confidence: 99%