2017
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2015.0566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Representation in Faculty and Leadership at Land Grant and Research Institutions

Abstract: A gronomy J our n al • Volume 10 9, I ssue 1 • 2 017 I t could be argued that the ongoing concern about recruiting and retaining women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has roots back to the fi rst formative years of the Land Grant Institutions (LGIs) in the United States, aft er their establishment in 1862 and 1890. One of the primary missions of the LGIs was to increase the proportion of women at their institutions (Bowman, 1962), in an eff ort to improve the numbers of women receiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(48 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study represents the first step in such a change process: highlighting trends and visible problems while creating greater institutional attentiveness to gender equity (Sturm, 2006). By itself, this may prove ineffective in achieving gender equity if not associated with structural changes (i.e., policy) that translate these findings into objective and enforceable actions (Kalev et al, 2006;Cho et al, 2017). Improvements in the upward mobility of women and under-represented groups within soil science can be achieved by implementing best practices that include: greater transparency in decision-making processes; greater accountability by decision-makers; formal codification and standardization of procedures, criteria, and responsibilities in decision making; and inclusion of organizational leadership as agents of change (Reskin, 2000).…”
Section: Recommendations In Looking Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study represents the first step in such a change process: highlighting trends and visible problems while creating greater institutional attentiveness to gender equity (Sturm, 2006). By itself, this may prove ineffective in achieving gender equity if not associated with structural changes (i.e., policy) that translate these findings into objective and enforceable actions (Kalev et al, 2006;Cho et al, 2017). Improvements in the upward mobility of women and under-represented groups within soil science can be achieved by implementing best practices that include: greater transparency in decision-making processes; greater accountability by decision-makers; formal codification and standardization of procedures, criteria, and responsibilities in decision making; and inclusion of organizational leadership as agents of change (Reskin, 2000).…”
Section: Recommendations In Looking Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample composition also changes across survey waves, explained by faculty change in LGUs over the decades. For instance, as shown in Table 3 , the proportion of female faculty increases from 8 percent in 1989 to 27 percent in 2015, largely reflecting the historical documented increase representation of women in land grant universities [ 44 ]. We also see a decrease in the proportion of tenured faculty, from 80 to 75 percent, which is consistent with an ageing faculty cohort.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agriculture, the discursive construction of women as supporters rather than leaders mirrors the construction of women in business and society more broadly (Cho, Chakraborty, & Rowland, 2017). Ideal leadership traits are constructed as associated with the masculine, such as intellectual rationality and self‐control, aggressiveness and competitiveness, readiness to assume risk and career orientation (O'Neil & Hopkins, 2015), coordination and control, with a preoccupation with the achievement of goals (Kerfoot & Knights, 1999).…”
Section: Gender and The Professional Agricultural Services Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%