2007
DOI: 10.1080/14733140601140881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender‐related events in psychotherapy supervision: Female trainee perspectives

Abstract: A gender-related event is an interaction, process, or event in psychotherapy supervision that the trainee felt was directly or indirectly related to, or influenced by: (a) the trainee's sex or the client's sex, (b) the social construction of gender, or (c) stereotypes and assumptions of gender roles. Gender-related events were studied for 111 female trainees. Approximately half (48%) of the reported events were considered supportive. The two most frequently reported supportive gender-related events were when s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
64
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(32 reference statements)
5
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supervisors are more likely to build and maintain effective supervisory relationships and to promote trainee self-efficacy by using supervisory skills such as encouraging developmentally appropriate autonomy, expressing confidence and trust in trainees' abilities, providing positive as well as constructive feedback, demonstrating their own clinical expertise in the service of trainee growth, and being responsive to supervisee's individual learning styles (Falender & Shafranske, 2004;Ladany et al, 2013). When they perceive that the supervisory relationship is strong, supervisees report stronger satisfaction with supervision (Ladany, Ellis, et al, 1999), improved cultural competence (Ladany et al, 1997), and fewer nondisclosures and greater disclosure in supervision (Ladany, Hill, Corbett, & Nutt, 1996;Ofek, 2013;Walker, Ladany, & Pate-Carolan, 2007). Although much of the research on the supervisory alliance is limited to trainee selfreport, there is significant support that the development and maintenance of an alliance is a sine qua non of effective supervision (Falender & Shafranske, 2004, 2014Ladany et al, 2013).…”
Section: Supervisory Alliancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Supervisors are more likely to build and maintain effective supervisory relationships and to promote trainee self-efficacy by using supervisory skills such as encouraging developmentally appropriate autonomy, expressing confidence and trust in trainees' abilities, providing positive as well as constructive feedback, demonstrating their own clinical expertise in the service of trainee growth, and being responsive to supervisee's individual learning styles (Falender & Shafranske, 2004;Ladany et al, 2013). When they perceive that the supervisory relationship is strong, supervisees report stronger satisfaction with supervision (Ladany, Ellis, et al, 1999), improved cultural competence (Ladany et al, 1997), and fewer nondisclosures and greater disclosure in supervision (Ladany, Hill, Corbett, & Nutt, 1996;Ofek, 2013;Walker, Ladany, & Pate-Carolan, 2007). Although much of the research on the supervisory alliance is limited to trainee selfreport, there is significant support that the development and maintenance of an alliance is a sine qua non of effective supervision (Falender & Shafranske, 2004, 2014Ladany et al, 2013).…”
Section: Supervisory Alliancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is to be seen, for example, in a supervisor's educational or emotional neglect of supervisees (Kozlowska, Nunn, & Cousens, 1997) or when there is gender (e.g. Allen, Szollos, & Williams, 1986;Walker, Ladany, & Pate-Carolan, 2007) or racially/ethnically based (e.g. Constantine & Sue, 2007) insensitivity or biases, or more general cultural unresponsiveness (Burkard et al, 2006).…”
Section: Nses and Supervisory Conflictmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, the lack of culturally sensitive supervision can negatively impact upon the supervisory relationship (Bertsch et al, 2014;Walker, Ladany, & Pate-Carolan, 2007) and on supervisee's emotional safety, confidence and well-being (Constantine & Sue, 2007;Wong et al, 2013). It may also diminish supervisee disclosure and negatively impact on therapy (Burkard et al, 2006;Walker et al, 2007). Further, empirical inquiry is indicated to develop culturally sensitive supervision and to inform competency development in this context (Son et al, 2013).…”
Section: Cultural and Multicultural Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The effects of appropriately discussing cultural issues in supervision have been reported to enrich the supervisory relationship, increase satisfaction with supervision and heighten supervisee awareness to cultural considerations in therapy (Burkard et al, 2006;Gatmon et al, 2001). In contrast, the lack of culturally sensitive supervision can negatively impact upon the supervisory relationship (Bertsch et al, 2014;Walker, Ladany, & Pate-Carolan, 2007) and on supervisee's emotional safety, confidence and well-being (Constantine & Sue, 2007;Wong et al, 2013). It may also diminish supervisee disclosure and negatively impact on therapy (Burkard et al, 2006;Walker et al, 2007).…”
Section: Cultural and Multicultural Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 89%