2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.04060.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender‐related differences in visceral perception in health and irritable bowel syndrome

Abstract: No gender differences in visceral perception were determined to exist between the healthy controls and the IBS patients. Therefore, the increased prevalence of IBS in women may be related to another set of pathophysiological factors, and not to gender-related differences in visceroperception.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent study of 58 IBS patients (34 men, 24 women) and 26 healthy controls, we showed that women with IBS had greater visceral sensitivity to rectosigmoid phasic distentions, with signifi cantly lower rectal discomfort thresholds, than healthy women or men with IBS [ 26 ]. However, in another study of 59 IBS patients (31 women and 28 men) and 21 healthy controls, Kim et al [ 27 ] found that there were no differences between women and men with IBS in visceral perception of ascending rectal distention. The differences in these two studies are likely to be due to methodologic differences.…”
Section: Computerized Barostat Distention Devicementioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent study of 58 IBS patients (34 men, 24 women) and 26 healthy controls, we showed that women with IBS had greater visceral sensitivity to rectosigmoid phasic distentions, with signifi cantly lower rectal discomfort thresholds, than healthy women or men with IBS [ 26 ]. However, in another study of 59 IBS patients (31 women and 28 men) and 21 healthy controls, Kim et al [ 27 ] found that there were no differences between women and men with IBS in visceral perception of ascending rectal distention. The differences in these two studies are likely to be due to methodologic differences.…”
Section: Computerized Barostat Distention Devicementioning
confidence: 61%
“…For example, Chang et al [ 26 ] measured rectal discomfort thresholds to randomized, phasic distentions before and after noxious sensitizing sigmoid distentions and showed greater induction of rectal perception, particularly in women. In contrast, Kim et al [ 27 ] administered rectal distentions only, given in an ascending manner, which is more vulnerable to response bias. Pressure thresholds to fi rst sensation, sense of urge to defecate, and maximal tolerated distention-but not pain or discomfort-were measured.…”
Section: Computerized Barostat Distention Devicementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Sloots et al [40] determined a greater rectal capacity and compliance in males which could account for the observed lower perception threshold in females. However, recent Barostat measurements confirm a heightened perception in females and the deterioration of sensitivity with age [41,42]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study based on a community sample of patients, women with IBS reported more symptoms of constipation and abdominal discomfort while men with IBS reported more diarrhea [6, 20]. However, such groupings do not seem to be of physiological relevance, and it is not certain whether these differences can be explained based on the pathophysiology of IBS [18]. In this study, patients with IBS were classified into 2 subgroups, a diarrhea-predominant group (IBS-D) and a constipation-predominant group (IBS-C), according to the predominant symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with IBS can easily be classified into subgroups according to the predominant presenting symptom, namely diarrhea, constipation or mixed types [4, 18, 19]. In one study based on a community sample of patients, women with IBS reported more symptoms of constipation and abdominal discomfort while men with IBS reported more diarrhea [6, 20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%