2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(02)00073-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender-related difference in sweat loss and its impact on exposure limits to heat stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Avellini et al [2] observed a significantly higher increase in the whole-body sweat rate in men than in women (35% vs. 15%) after 10 days of adaptation to humid heat. Mehnert et al [27] reported highly significant sex-related differences in sweat rates. The differences remained statistically significant even when women and men were matched for body surface area or surface-to-mass ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avellini et al [2] observed a significantly higher increase in the whole-body sweat rate in men than in women (35% vs. 15%) after 10 days of adaptation to humid heat. Mehnert et al [27] reported highly significant sex-related differences in sweat rates. The differences remained statistically significant even when women and men were matched for body surface area or surface-to-mass ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the CTM value of 40.4 1C was based on an exhaustive heat stroke model in rats, whereas many models and instances of heat stroke are of a passive nature (Chiu et al, 1995(Chiu et al, , 1996Haveman et al, 1996;Kao and Lin, 1996;Leon et al, 2005;Lin et al, 1994Lin et al, , 1997Liu et al, 2000;Romanovsky and Blatteis, 1996;Wilkinson et al, 1988;Wright, 1976;Wright et al, 1977). Third, noted species (Hutchison, 1961), strain (Furuyama, 1982), seasonal (Hoar, 1955;Hutchison, 1961), circadian (Hutchison, 1961;Kosh and Hutchison, 1968;Wright et al, 1977), photoperiod (Hutchison, 1961), geographic (Carter et al, 2005;Hutchison, 1961) and sex effects (Aoki et al, 1998;Carpenter and Nunneley, 1988;Furuyama, 1982;Lublin et al, 1995;Ohara et al, 1975;Mehnert et al, 2002) on heat susceptibility suggest that considerable variability of CTM will exist between studies depending on one or all of these factors. For example, the lowest observed CTM in passively heat stressed mice is 40.7 1C (unpublished observations).…”
Section: The Time-intensity Relationship Of Heat Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence could not be traced out for the relation between sweat loss and fat burning. Some of the earlier studies have shown a high sweat production among males but many of recent studies have rejected this absolute phenomenon and established the effect of fitness and training level as the main causal factor (Mehnert et al , 2002). Further the rate of sweat production has also been attributed to body surface area, height and weight of the subjects (Pandolf et al, 1986).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%