2006
DOI: 10.1177/0891243206293299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, Race, and Affirmative Action

Abstract: In this article, the authors operationalize the intersection of gender and race in survey research. Using quantitative data from the Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality, they investigate how gender/racial stereotypes about African Americans affect Whites' attitudes about two types of affirmative action programs: (1) job training and education and (2) hiring and promotion. The authors find that gender/racial prejudice towards Black women and Black men influences Whites' opposition to affirmative action at diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, an intersectionality analysis captures several levels of difference. In particular, it reveals how intersecting forms of discrimination and oppression create opportunities and social and material benefits for those "who enjoy normative or non-marginalized statuses such as Whiteness, maleness, heterosexuality, or upper class status"[34] (p. 808).…”
Section: Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, an intersectionality analysis captures several levels of difference. In particular, it reveals how intersecting forms of discrimination and oppression create opportunities and social and material benefits for those "who enjoy normative or non-marginalized statuses such as Whiteness, maleness, heterosexuality, or upper class status"[34] (p. 808).…”
Section: Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the value of intersectional research is the ability to examine how intersecting identities create both privilege and disadvantage, yielding benefits and hindrances (or both) depending on the particular identity groups that comprise the individual as well as the social context in which certain identity groups are made salient (Collins, 1990). Across the social sciences, the intersection of identities has been shown to influence sexual harassment perceptions (Welsh, Carr, MacQuarrie, & Huntley, 2006), gender and racial stereotypes (Sesko & Biernat, 2010;Steinbugler, Press, & Dias, 2006), learning and work experiences (Kvasny, Trauth, & Morgan, 2009), as well as disparities in mental health status (Rosenfield, 2012). Across the social sciences, the intersection of identities has been shown to influence sexual harassment perceptions (Welsh, Carr, MacQuarrie, & Huntley, 2006), gender and racial stereotypes (Sesko & Biernat, 2010;Steinbugler, Press, & Dias, 2006), learning and work experiences (Kvasny, Trauth, & Morgan, 2009), as well as disparities in mental health status (Rosenfield, 2012).…”
Section: Intersectionality Definedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broader psychology domain has only recently acknowledged the utility of intersectional research despite its prevalence in other related research domains. Across the social sciences, the intersection of identities has been shown to influence sexual harassment perceptions (Welsh, Carr, MacQuarrie, & Huntley, 2006), gender and racial stereotypes (Sesko & Biernat, 2010; Steinbugler, Press, & Dias, 2006), learning and work experiences (Kvasny, Trauth, & Morgan, 2009), as well as disparities in mental health status (Rosenfield, 2012). Despite these findings, the existing I-O psychology literature has largely overlooked how intersecting identities critically affect employees’ workplace experiences.…”
Section: Intersectionality Definedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific locations in this matrix of intersecting social hierarchies create a unique set of experiences that involve more than the sum of their parts and reflect the multiplicative nature of intersecting oppressions (Collins, 2000 andKing, 1989). Because hierarchies of power are cross cutting, it is likely that a person will be simultaneously advantaged by certain identities and disadvantaged by others (Steinbugler, Press, Dias, 2006). For example, a Black man may experience privilege vis-à-vis his maleness but be marginalized for his race (Steinbugler, Press, and Dias, 2006).…”
Section: Intersectionality: Race and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because hierarchies of power are cross cutting, it is likely that a person will be simultaneously advantaged by certain identities and disadvantaged by others (Steinbugler, Press, Dias, 2006). For example, a Black man may experience privilege vis-à-vis his maleness but be marginalized for his race (Steinbugler, Press, and Dias, 2006). As a result, race and gender can sometimes combine to create effects that are unique to specific gender-race-party groups that may be invisible if these interactions are viewed separately.…”
Section: Intersectionality: Race and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%