2018
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender nonconformity of identical twins with discordant sexual orientations: Evidence from childhood photographs.

Abstract: Childhood gender nonconformity (femininity in males, masculinity in females) predicts a nonstraight (gay, lesbian, or bisexual) sexual orientation in adulthood. In previous work, nonstraight twins reported more childhood gender nonconformity than their genetically identical, but straight, cotwins. However, self-reports could be biased. We therefore assessed gender nonconformity via ratings of photographs from childhood and adulthood. These ratings came from independent observers naïve to study hypotheses. Iden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did collect data on gender nonconformity and computed correlations with finger length ratios. Gender nonconformity was measured using standardized questionnaires (Rieger, Linsenmeier, Gygax, & Bailey, 2008) in addition to observer ratings of gender nonconformity as seen in photographs of participants (Watts et al, 2018). Correlations between self-reported and observer rated gender nonconformity and 2D:4D were weak and not significant (results not shown).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did collect data on gender nonconformity and computed correlations with finger length ratios. Gender nonconformity was measured using standardized questionnaires (Rieger, Linsenmeier, Gygax, & Bailey, 2008) in addition to observer ratings of gender nonconformity as seen in photographs of participants (Watts et al, 2018). Correlations between self-reported and observer rated gender nonconformity and 2D:4D were weak and not significant (results not shown).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The majority of non-straight twins openly identified as such. Perhaps non-straight individuals who are "out" are more likely to show gender nonconformity (a correlate of homosexuality; Lippa, 2005;Watts, Holmes, Raines, Orbell, & Rieger, 2018), because their expression makes it more difficult to be closeted about their sexual orientation. If gender nonconformity links to sexatypical digit ratios, then perhaps individuals who are "out" and participated were also biased toward sex-atypical digit ratios.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hope that our results will encourage research to elucidate their precise nature. Watts et al (2018) .59 (19) -.18 (24) Dawood et al (2000) .54 (29) Coefficients for concordant pairs are from the multiple regression predicting the first homosexual brother's childhood and adult gender nonconformity scores from the second brother's respective scores, controlling for the first brother's birth year and educational level. Coefficients for discordant pairs are from the multiple regression predicting heterosexual brothers' childhood and adult gender nonconformity scores from homosexual brother's respective scores, controlling for heterosexual brothers' birth year and educational level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homosexual women are more masculine (and less feminine) than heterosexual women in their self-reported behaviors and interests (Lippa, 2005). Furthermore, others perceive homosexual women as more masculine than heterosexual women, based on the way they appear, sound, or move; and this observable difference emerges in their early childhood (Johnson et al, 2007;Rieger et al, 2010;Watts et al, 2018b). We predicted such differences in masculinity-femininity, dependent on women's sexual orientation, in the present work (Hypothesis 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%