Gender mainstreaming and evaluation in the EU: comparative perspectives from feminist institutionalism

Abstract

This article presents a focused comparative analysis of the institutionalization of two governance practices in the European Commission that levy distinct challenges to the gender status quo: gender mainstreaming (which overtly challenges gender bias) and evaluation (which does not have explicit feminist aspirations). With reference to five dimensions, we identify evaluation as relatively strongly institutionalized, and gender mainstreaming as relatively weakly institutionalized. We draw on the explanatory power of feminist institutionalism to unpack these findings, arguing that a feminist institutional perspective can shed light on this variation, as it provides greater insight into the formal and informal institutions that constrain, enable and shape the implementation of evaluation and gender mainstreaming. We assert that the notion of path dependency, the logic of appropriateness, and the concept of layering serve as useful tools to understand the gendered nature of the European Commission. This research provides insights into the institutional factors that impact the implementation of gender equality strategies (such as gender mainstreaming). In turn, this contributes to the development of more effective strategies to promote institutional change toward greater equality.

Understanding the gender regime in the European External Action Service

“…The EU’s own approach to promoting the equality principle is rooted in the Treaties, and since Amsterdam (1998) it revolves around gender mainstreaming (GM). It is not for this article to explore the opportunities and constraints embedded in this approach (for a detailed analysis see Minto and Mergaert, 2018; O’Connor, 2014; Pollack and Hafner-Burton, 2000). However, GM represents a highly institutionalized form of internal norm diffusion.…”

Femininity is not inferiority: women-led civil society organizations and “countering violent extremism” in Nigeria

“…This article has demonstrated that the institutionalization of "women-led civil society organizations" can strengthen their potential to increase women's participation in the public sphere generally. Minto and Mergaert (2018) correctly note that weak institutionalization of gender mainstreaming in terms of structures and procedures, quality, accountability compliance and stability undermine the transformative potential of gender equality strategies. The institutionalization of "women-led civil society organizations" in the international women, peace and security agenda is an important step towards gender equality in contemporary Nigeria.…”

Gender and policy response to COVID-19 in Canada and Scotland

“…Sociological Institutionalism (SI) argues that institutions are essential because they are not only made up of formal rules and practices but also "embedded with symbol systems, cognitive scripts and moral templates" that shape the behavior of their members (ibid). Political actors are therefore not just rational beings, but social actors that exist within institutional contexts, conforming to the logic of appropriateness in their actions (Hall and Taylor, 1996;Minto and Mergaert 2018). The presence of gender lens in this perspective allows the framing of the formal advancements made in gender issues in Western nations.…”