1997
DOI: 10.1108/09649429710171136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender issues in management education: a new teaching resource

Abstract: Discusses the gendered culture of management education and its role in perpetuating a gendered culture of management, which in turn inhibits the equitable progression of women through the ranks of management. Reports findings from a recent Australian survey which revealed a masculine bias in management education, which disadvantages both female and male learners. Perceived gender paradigms of male educators may result in women learners being more disadvantaged than men, and issues of concern to male students c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, completing a management degree is often a precursor to women progressing in management (Roberts & Karambayya, 2017). Yet, management education programs demonstrate a predominantly masculine institutional culture (Sinclair as cited in Smith, 1997) that draws on historical assumptions about gender that constrain what men and women can achieve (Williams as cited in Apple & King, 1983). By extension, the implicit underpinnings of management education are typically associated with hard, masculine characteristics: fewer management education programs incorporate the softer interpersonal and social competencies typically associated with women (Lämsä & Savela, 2014).…”
Section: Gender and Management Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, completing a management degree is often a precursor to women progressing in management (Roberts & Karambayya, 2017). Yet, management education programs demonstrate a predominantly masculine institutional culture (Sinclair as cited in Smith, 1997) that draws on historical assumptions about gender that constrain what men and women can achieve (Williams as cited in Apple & King, 1983). By extension, the implicit underpinnings of management education are typically associated with hard, masculine characteristics: fewer management education programs incorporate the softer interpersonal and social competencies typically associated with women (Lämsä & Savela, 2014).…”
Section: Gender and Management Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has a direct impact on the student learning experience where in teaching, learning and development, regardless of gender, lecturers may perceive management/managers as male or gender neutral. Smith (1997) referred Hite and McDonald (1995) to illustrate the impact of this perception and comments that a low level of gender diversity awareness among educators and learners can cause tensions in personal interactions and classroom settings, resulting in embarrassment and discomfort for the individuals affected and it can pejoratively influence the assessment of learner competence by educators.…”
Section: Gendered Management Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith (1997) suggests that there is a masculine bias in management education, which disadvantages both female and male learners and which may discourage managers from capitalising on gender diversity in the workplace. I felt I needed peer support.…”
Section: Managing Higher Education-placing Women Academics On the Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%