Gender Inequality in Precarious Academic Work: Female Adjunct Professors in Italy

Abstract

International research studies and national reports point out two specific aspects which characterize women's academic careers (cf. Eagly, 2003; Glass and Cook, 2016). First, few women advance to senior academic roles. Second, although female academics progress in numbers equivalent to their male colleagues up to a certain point, in most cases their academic career paths either stop before they arrive at tenured positions or they remain in the lower ranks of the hierarchical academic structure. Thus, while the numeric growth and temporal extension of fixed-term positions has, overall, increased women's opportunities for researching and teaching at universities, on the other hand, it has impeded their access to tenured positions. To better highlight this dynamic, this article focuses on the situation of female adjunct professors in Italy. The interest in adjunct professors is twofold: on the one hand, the social and economic status of adjunct professors in the Italian academic system have worsened over time, from independent to formal independent workers; on the other hand, compared with other non-tenured positions, there are substantially fewer female adjunct professors than male. We first provide an overall picture of the historical and juridical transformations of the rank distribution of faculty in Italian universities from the perspective of gender. As a second step, we compare the actual working conditions of female and male adjunct professors on the basis of a survey carried out from January to October 2018 (5,556 respondents corresponding to more than 20% of the population) and semi-structured interviews with 31 adjunct professors. The aim of the analysis is to pinpoint objective and subjective gender similarities and differences regarding both socioeconomic variables and the ways male and female adjunct professors think about their academic and extra-academic work; how they experience the academic environment between paid and unpaid work, construct their professional/academic identity, and imagine their professional future and perceive problems related to the administration and organization of their academic work.

Do precarious female employment and political autonomy affect the under-5 mortality rate? Evidence from 166 countries

“…Earlier studies mostly ignored precarious female work when developing models that lacked economic strategies to reduce under-5 mortality [ 16 – 18 ]. Precarious female employment has been extensively studied previously in terms of a variety of socio-economic factors, including education disparities between formal and informal education [ 19 ], labour market rigidities [ 20 ], family formation [ 21 ], health consequences [ 22 ], labour market shocks associated with refugee inflows [ 23 ], and social norms [ 24 ]. However, little or no progress has been made regarding women’s engagement in managing political affairs in connection to insecure female labour and under-5 mortality rates.…”

Let the people decide: citizen deliberation on the role of GMOs in Mali’s agriculture

“…However, we were unable to invite specialist witnesses who could speak about the gendered impacts of GM crops on social relations, household nutrition, and the work load of women farmers. The widespread institutional discrimination that marginalises gender studies and prevents many women from making a career in universities and research institutes (Goetz 1997;Winchester and Browning 2015;De Angelis and Grüning 2020) limited our options to invite suitable witnesses. Inviting more women scholars to give gendered evidence should nevertheless be a priority in future mini-publics on GM crops in West Africa-especially because recent research in Burkina Faso has shown that gendered labour dynamics and decision-making are affected by GM cotton cultivation (Luna 2020).…”

Intersectionality of social and philosophical frameworks with technology: could ethical AI restore equality of opportunities in academia?

“…A cademic institutions and academia more generally, have been under criticism due to their lack of equality and diversity (of gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and so on) (Munar et al, 2017;Nielsen, 2017a;Mayer and Rathmann, 2018;Kalpazidou Schmidt and Cacace, 2019). This is a global issue that, despite ongoing debates and targeted policies, continue to affect both developing and developed countries [e.g., (Monroe et al, 2008;Moschkovich, 2017;Nielsen, 2017b;Chitsamatanga et al, 2018;Maximova-Mentzoni and Egeland, 2019;De Angelis and Grüning, 2020). For instance, even in Scandinavian countries which are often perceived as genderequal societies, female staff representativity at associate professorship and full professorship levels were just ca.…”