Gender Inequalities in Neolithic Iberia: A Multi-Proxy Approach

Abstract

Gender archaeology approaches to Iberian late prehistory have experienced a significant growth in the last two decades. However, much of the work undertaken has focused on specific aspects of the archaeological record (rock art, burial practices), particularly from the Bronze Age and Iron Age periods for which the evidence is more readily available. In addition, it has tended to be regional or local in scope. Here, we attempt an empirically robust multi-proxy approach to the development of early gender inequalities in Neolithic Iberia. Inspired by Gerda Lerner's ideas on the origins of patriarchy and based on a systematic collection of data analysed by means of significance testing, we present the first comprehensive study of gender dissymmetries in Iberian prehistory. Our conclusions suggest that, first, the multi-proxy method used has potential for the systematic study of gender inequalities on the basis of archaeological data and, second, that the Neolithic witnessed emerging gender inequalities that set the basis for male domination in later periods.

Searching for the “Roots” of Masculinity in Primates and the Human Evolutionary Past

“…Current Anthropology Volume 62, Supplement 23, February 2021 the overall fossil record, and none of the sites show consistent, clear connections to contemporary patterns of gender differences. While gender likely has deep roots, it is not at all clear that early concepts and practices resembled current patterns (Adovasio, Soffer, and Page 2007;Cintas-Peña and Sanjuan 2019;Fuentes 2012;Fuentes and Visala 2017;Gero and Conkey 1991;Snow 2013). While many contemporary patterns of gender difference do not show up in the material record until the last 15,000 years or so, they then become clear and common.…”

Error or Minority? The Identification of Non-binary Gender in Prehistoric Burials in Central Europe

“…Independently of whether this is true or not, there is certainly widespread agreement that warfare in antiquity was mostly men's business (e.g. Cintas-Peña & García Sanjuán 2019; Gentile et al 2018; Harding 2015; Jantzen et al 2011). Given this premise, one way to investigate socially accepted gender variance would be to ask the following question: Were female individuals formally granted masculine attributes in the burial rite?…”

Coeducación patrimonial en museos y patrimonio histórico-artístico: una herramienta didáctica para aplicar la perspectiva de género durante la mediación en educación patrimonial

“…Algunos museos han mejorado los relatos de sus salas introduciendo la historia de las mujeres, pero se han olvidado de presentar la vida cotidiana o la integración de otras culturas olvidadas, la infancia, las personas mayores o discapacitadas. Esto pasa, por ejemplo, en los museos de arqueología, donde todo lo que se relaciona con el hombre es prioritario en objetos presentados, y temáticas (Prados y López, ed., 2017;Querol, 2017;Cintas-Peña y García Sanjuan, 2019;García Llagas, 2020, Bécares, 2020. Obviando, por ejemplo, la infancia, los niños y las niñas no se ven representados ni representadas, todo y siendo los centros educativos, el público más numeroso que visita los museos gracias a sus actividades educativas (Cacheda y Granell, 2019;Sánchez Romero, 2019;Cacheda, 2021a;González, 2020).…”