2023
DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0239-22.2023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Impacts the Relationship between Mood Disorder Symptoms and Effortful Avoidance Performance

Abstract: We must often decide how much effort to exert or withhold to avoid undesirable outcomes or obtain rewards. In depression and anxiety, levels of avoidance can be excessive and reward-seeking may be reduced. Yet outstanding questions remain about the links between motivated action/inhibition and anxiety and depression levels, and whether they differ between men and women. Here we examined the relationship between anxiety and depression scores, and performance on effortful active and inhibitory avoidance (Study 1… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, although our population exhibited a wide range of depression scores -including those above clinical thresholds (Wang & Gorenstein, 2013) -this population was non-clinical. In contrast, much work on the impact of reward sensitivity on cognitive flexibility and related constructs has focused on participants who were clinically diagnosed with depression (Alloy, Olino, Freed, & Nusslock, 2016;Terpstra et al, 2023) or on rodents in which chronic stress was directly induced (Watt et al, 2017). In order to obtain the highest accuracy and reward possible, participants may have titrated the task's difficulty -through choosing a higher proportion of LR trials -to a level at which they can consistently complete the task and at which the value of their effort was greatest (Shenhav et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, although our population exhibited a wide range of depression scores -including those above clinical thresholds (Wang & Gorenstein, 2013) -this population was non-clinical. In contrast, much work on the impact of reward sensitivity on cognitive flexibility and related constructs has focused on participants who were clinically diagnosed with depression (Alloy, Olino, Freed, & Nusslock, 2016;Terpstra et al, 2023) or on rodents in which chronic stress was directly induced (Watt et al, 2017). In order to obtain the highest accuracy and reward possible, participants may have titrated the task's difficulty -through choosing a higher proportion of LR trials -to a level at which they can consistently complete the task and at which the value of their effort was greatest (Shenhav et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each trial, participants could choose to perform an easier visual short-term memory task for a lower reward or a harder task for a higher reward. We examined overall visuospatial short-term memory capacity as well as indices of depressive traits (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996), chronic stress (Levenstein et al, 1993), anhedonia (Rizvi et al, 2015), and reward sensitivity (Terpstra et al, 2023) as predictors of the tendency to choose lower or higher effort tasks. Furthermore, we used drift diffusion modeling (Hales et al, 2024;Ratcliff, 1978) to examine factors that may contribute to choice biases.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations