2020
DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2020.1822242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Identity and Health-related Outcomes in a National Sample of College Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the Q index and the Galbraith graph indicated the presence of data heterogeneity. The data from De Pedro (2017) [35], Gamarel (2020) [38], and Azagba (2019) [29] for cigarettes and Kelly (2015) [42] and Dinger (2020) [36] for e-cigarettes contributed the most heterogeneity to this current study. Despite this heterogeneity, our sensitivity analysis showed that by removing each of these articles, the OR changed very little, and the precision did not increase (Figure 2).…”
Section: Current Tobacco Use and Tobacco Use Disordermentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Both the Q index and the Galbraith graph indicated the presence of data heterogeneity. The data from De Pedro (2017) [35], Gamarel (2020) [38], and Azagba (2019) [29] for cigarettes and Kelly (2015) [42] and Dinger (2020) [36] for e-cigarettes contributed the most heterogeneity to this current study. Despite this heterogeneity, our sensitivity analysis showed that by removing each of these articles, the OR changed very little, and the precision did not increase (Figure 2).…”
Section: Current Tobacco Use and Tobacco Use Disordermentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this sense, as shown in Figure 3, the Q index was 34.90 (p < 0.001), which along with the Galbraith graphic, indicated the presence of heterogeneity. The data from Aparicio-García (2018) [28], De Pedro (2017) [35], and Dinger (2020) [36] contributed most of the heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis showed that removing each of these items changed the OR very little, although a subgroup analysis in which these three items were excluded to remove this heterogeneity (Q = 5.90; p = 0.315) resulted in a slightly higher pooled OR of 1.03 (95% CI [0.93, 1.15]).…”
Section: Current Alcohol Use and Alcohol Use Disordermentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations