1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199908)8:5<379::aid-hec458>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, heroin consumption and economic behaviour

Abstract: The study examines differences in consumption and economic behaviour among male and female heroin users. A sample of heroin injectors (n = 1834) was interviewed near the needle-exchange service in Oslo and information on consumption, prices, and income was recorded. The consumption pattern of the heroin addicts varies by gender, with females consuming relatively less alcohol and cannabis but significantly more heroin than their male counterparts. The finding of greater heroin consumption among women is surpris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(), and DeSimone and Farrelly () estimate the youth demand for illicit drugs, and in several specifications report price elasticities in absolute value which lie below the overall median . Furthermore, although some studies explore gender differences in illicit drug demand (e.g., Bretteville‐Jensen, ; Saffer and Chaloupka, ; Williams et al ., ), other studies (e.g., Van Ours, ; Grossman and Chaloupka, ; Liu et al ., ) address the addictive nature of illicit drugs by including either lagged consumption (i.e., myopic addiction) or both lagged and lead consumption (i.e., rational addiction) in the specification of demand. Also, a number of studies address relationships between drugs by controlling for the influence of alcohol and/or other illicit drugs on the demand for a particular drug.…”
Section: Literature Summarymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…(), and DeSimone and Farrelly () estimate the youth demand for illicit drugs, and in several specifications report price elasticities in absolute value which lie below the overall median . Furthermore, although some studies explore gender differences in illicit drug demand (e.g., Bretteville‐Jensen, ; Saffer and Chaloupka, ; Williams et al ., ), other studies (e.g., Van Ours, ; Grossman and Chaloupka, ; Liu et al ., ) address the addictive nature of illicit drugs by including either lagged consumption (i.e., myopic addiction) or both lagged and lead consumption (i.e., rational addiction) in the specification of demand. Also, a number of studies address relationships between drugs by controlling for the influence of alcohol and/or other illicit drugs on the demand for a particular drug.…”
Section: Literature Summarymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Female injectors are known to have a slightly different drug using pattern than men [2628], and the findings in toxicology are therefore likely to mirror this. Although women make up only a small proportion of those who die from overdoses, it is still important that they are addressed specifically when preventive measures are designed and implemented, in order to reach their specific needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is paralleled by naturalistic drug use patterns; for example, non-dealing opioid-dependent individuals report that they consume significantly less heroin per day as its UP increases, i.e. own-price elasticity (Bretteville-Jensen, 1999; Roddy and Greenwald, in press), and methadone patients who value money (e.g. travel, child care) costs at a higher rate exhibit significantly reduced attendance to consume their daily dose relative to patients who value those costs at a lower rate (Borisova and Goodman, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%