Abstract:Multiracial self-identification is frequently portrayed as a disproportionately female tendency, but previous research has not probed the conditions under which this relationship might occur. Using the 2015 Pew Survey of Multiracial Adults, we offer a more comprehensive analysis that considers gender differences at two distinct stages: reporting multiple races in one's ancestry and selecting multiple races to describe oneself. We also examine self-identification patterns by the generational locus of multiracia… Show more
“…Third, because gender did not play a role during our recruitment and eligibility processes, our sample overwhelmingly consisted of female-identifying individuals; we had one male-identifying participant and one participant who identified as gender-queer/non-binary. While previous research has implied gendered patterns in multiracial identification, this may not hold true in all cases (Xu et al, 2021 ), and our non-gender-diverse sample hampers our ability to understand the intersectional implications of gender for multiracial experience. Our sample also consists mostly of “first-generation” multiracial folks, who have monoracial parents from two different racial groups.…”
The role of family members in racial identity development is often constrained to conceptualizations of parental socialization, with a focus on socialization during childhood and adolescence. However, parents may continue to play a role in racial identity development as youth enter young adulthood and continue to explore who they are. Our study investigates how parents feature in the racial identity meaning-making of multiracial Black college students to understand the role that parents may continue to play for youth’s identities as they age. We invoke a critical m(ai)cro perspective to fully consider how parent influence necessarily intertwines with macrosystem dynamics of anti-Blackness, white supremacy, and monoracism for multiracial Black youth’s identity meaning-making in the context of Black Lives Matter. Through inductive analysis of semi-structured interviews with 11 multiracial Black (“Black + ”) college students, we found that young adults mention parents or familial adults when discussing their racial identity to (1) recount parental guidance on racial identity, (2) illustrate the racial politics of multiracial identification, and (3) expose the nuances of navigating (un)shared identity spaces within the family. Our findings highlight the relevance of parental socialization in the adulthood years, and that parents are inextricably implicated in how youth are making sense of macrosystem dynamics of anti-Blackness and monoracism. We end with a discussion of takeaways for parents of multiracial youth.
“…Third, because gender did not play a role during our recruitment and eligibility processes, our sample overwhelmingly consisted of female-identifying individuals; we had one male-identifying participant and one participant who identified as gender-queer/non-binary. While previous research has implied gendered patterns in multiracial identification, this may not hold true in all cases (Xu et al, 2021 ), and our non-gender-diverse sample hampers our ability to understand the intersectional implications of gender for multiracial experience. Our sample also consists mostly of “first-generation” multiracial folks, who have monoracial parents from two different racial groups.…”
The role of family members in racial identity development is often constrained to conceptualizations of parental socialization, with a focus on socialization during childhood and adolescence. However, parents may continue to play a role in racial identity development as youth enter young adulthood and continue to explore who they are. Our study investigates how parents feature in the racial identity meaning-making of multiracial Black college students to understand the role that parents may continue to play for youth’s identities as they age. We invoke a critical m(ai)cro perspective to fully consider how parent influence necessarily intertwines with macrosystem dynamics of anti-Blackness, white supremacy, and monoracism for multiracial Black youth’s identity meaning-making in the context of Black Lives Matter. Through inductive analysis of semi-structured interviews with 11 multiracial Black (“Black + ”) college students, we found that young adults mention parents or familial adults when discussing their racial identity to (1) recount parental guidance on racial identity, (2) illustrate the racial politics of multiracial identification, and (3) expose the nuances of navigating (un)shared identity spaces within the family. Our findings highlight the relevance of parental socialization in the adulthood years, and that parents are inextricably implicated in how youth are making sense of macrosystem dynamics of anti-Blackness and monoracism. We end with a discussion of takeaways for parents of multiracial youth.
“…Similarly, I did not use language like “biracial” to include students who may identify with more than two racial categories, although several respondents identified personally as biracial. Given that most Americans perceive “Hispanic or Latinx” as a category akin to Black and White (Xu et al 2021), and following the example of Morning and Saperstein (2018), I included students who identified as multiracial by virtue of identifying as Hispanic or Latinx and another race (e.g., Hispanic or Latinx and Black).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, over 10 percent of babies born in the United States have parents who identify with different races (Alba 2020). By 2050, individuals who identify with multiple race categories will be 20 percent of the U.S. populace (Davenport 2018), and if one considers “Hispanic” a racial category, as many Americans do (Xu et al 2021), the West Coast and the Southwest have already reached that threshold (Lopez 2003).…”
U.S. colleges and universities are under increasing pressure to appear racially diverse, but have yet to account systematically for a quickly growing contingent of multiracial-identifying students. Drawing on interviews with multiracial-identifying undergraduates at Western University, I demonstrate how everyday university practices compromise multiracial identities in the pursuit of diversity. The term compromise carries dual meaning, referring to instances where Western refashioned multiracial identities into monoracial ones and instances where multiracial-identifying students were in compromised positions. Participants inferred how their identities might be most useful to the university in appearing diverse, leading them to question their belonging and even recast their identities accordingly. These interactions occurred across organizational contexts, including dorms, community centers, and classrooms. Persistent organizational representations of diversity in monoracial terms communicates to students that multiracial identities are both a challenge to accommodate and of potential utility to institutions seeking to appear as diverse as possible.
“…Multiracial identity is complex. Decisions regarding selfidentification vary from person to person (Bratter 2018;Davenport 2016;Xu et al 2021), and multiracial individuals face unique forms of social and economic marginalization (Bratter and Damaske 2013;Bratter and O'Connell 2017). While there is evidence of considerable state-to-state variation in the multiracial population (U.S. Census Bureau 2022), our understanding of the spatial distribution of multiracial populations at smaller spatial scales is limited.…”
Section: Ethnoracial Change In the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly, U.S. population growth over the past decade has been driven entirely by increases among ethnoracial minority groups: Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, and Pacific Islander. 1 Moreover, the rise of America's multiracial population has blurred racial boundaries and complicated conventional measures of race and ethnicity (Bratter 2018;Xu et al 2021).…”
Growing ethnoracial diversity is a defining characteristic of the America’s urban and suburban populations. Here we shift attention to growing but underappreciated diversity in rural areas and use U.S. Census data from 1980 to 2020 to investigate trends in rural diversity. We compare three rural Americas: metropolitan expansion counties (i.e., growth at the metro fringe), emergence counties (recently reclassified small metropolitan areas), and left behind counties (consistently rural places). We estimate exposure to diversity across ethnoracial groups and produce counterfactual estimates that highlight the unique contributions of each group’s growth and decline to overall diversity. Although diversity is increasing across county types, the demographic profiles of expansion and emergence counties remain similar to left behind counties. White and minority exposure to diversity is increasing overtime, with disparities in exposure having converged overtime. Finally, rural diversity also is increasing due to both growing multiracial populations and White population decline.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.