2014
DOI: 10.1111/1745-9125.12052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, Friendship Networks, and Delinquency: A Dynamic Network Approach

Abstract: Researchers have examined selection and influence processes in shaping delinquency similarity among friends, but little is known about the role of gender in moderating these relationships. Our objective is to examine differences between adolescent boys and girls regarding delinquency-based selection and influence processes. Using longitudinal network data from adolescents attending two large schools in AddHealth (N = 1,857) and stochastic actor-oriented models, we evaluate whether girls are influenced to a gre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
111
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
7
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases where data were available for both parents, we selected the higher combined score. Numerous studies have adopted this approach using Add Health (Haynie, Doogan, and Soller 2014; Haynie, Steffensmeier, and Bell 2007; Kuhl, Warner, and Wilczak 2012; Roettger et al 2011). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where data were available for both parents, we selected the higher combined score. Numerous studies have adopted this approach using Add Health (Haynie, Doogan, and Soller 2014; Haynie, Steffensmeier, and Bell 2007; Kuhl, Warner, and Wilczak 2012; Roettger et al 2011). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where data were available for both parents, we selected the higher combined score. 3 Numerous studies have adopted this approach using Add Health (Haynie, Doogan, and Soller 2014; Haynie, Steffensmeier, and Bell 2007; Kuhl, Warner, and Wilczak 2012; Roettger et al 2011). …”
Section: Life Course Transitions Ses and Delinquencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, structural network characteristics (e.g., network size, density, and reciprocity) are correlated with individual centrality measures (37, 38), and are also known to facilitate the diffusion and monitoring of norms within groups (39), thus would be expected to exert an influence on conversations between network members. The gender composition of networks has also been shown to shape friendship formation as well as norms that could influence communication patters (40). Similarly, the degree to which networks were comprised of friendship vs. acquaintance ties would be expected to influence the structure of the closest friendship networks as well as the conversations between network members.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%