2017
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2017.1306796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Fairness in Self-Efficacy? A Rasch-Based Validity Study of the General Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (GASE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Rasch Model is part of the family of Item Response Theory (IRT) psychometric models [52]. The Rasch model for ordered response categories [53] is a generalization of the original model for dichotomous items [44] and is displayed in Eq 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Rasch Model is part of the family of Item Response Theory (IRT) psychometric models [52]. The Rasch model for ordered response categories [53] is a generalization of the original model for dichotomous items [44] and is displayed in Eq 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the items fitting a Rasch model exhibit the measurement properties of (1) unidimensionality: the items measure a single psychological trait (i.e. perceived stress); (2) monotonicity: endorsement of “higher” categories are an increasing function of the latent trait; (3) homogeneity: the item difficulty order is the same for all respondents; (4) local independence: items are conditionally independent given the latent trait; and (5) absence of differential item functioning: items are conditionally independent of exogenous variables given the latent trait [52, 58].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our findings were based on self-reported measures, and we relied on students’ subjective report. Recent studies have suggested that males and females have different standards when self-reporting academic self-efficacy, and gender bias was observed in academic self-efficacy studies (e.g., Nielsen et al, 2018 ). Therefore, multimethod approaches, such as teachers’ report and parents’ report, are needed to provide more comprehensive results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-efficacy scales Table A1. Self-efficacy (PAL-SE) and Pre-Academic Exam Self-efficacy (PAE-SE) scales adapted from Nielsen et al (2018) Items…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES;Schwartzer & Jerusalem, 1995), or adaptations of it, is probably the most commonly used in health related research, in educational research it is more common to construe self-efficacy as at least domainspecific; e.g. the General Academic Self-efficacy Scale (GASE; Nielsen et al, 2018) and the Physics Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ: Lindstrøm & Sharma, 2011), both for the academic domain and both based on the GSE. In between the general and very specific instruments, are a range of sub-domain-, context-and course-specific self-efficacy instruments, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%