Gender equity programmes in academic medicine: a realist evaluation approach to Athena SWAN processes

Abstract

ObjectivesGender inequity has persisted in academic medicine. Yet equity is vital for countries to achieve their full potential in terms of translational research and patient benefit. This study sought to understand how the gender equity programme, Athena SWAN, can be enabled and constrained by interactions between the programme and the context it is implemented into, and whether these interactions might produce unintended consequences.DesignMultimethod qualitative case studies using a realist evaluation approach.Setting5 departments from a university medical school hosting a Translational Research Organisation.Participants25 hours of observations of gender equality committee meetings, 16 in-depth interviews with Heads of Departments, Committee Leads and key personnel involved in the initiative. 4 focus groups with 15 postdoctoral researchers, lecturers and senior lecturers.ResultsThe implementation of Athena SWAN principles was reported to have created social space to address gender inequity and to have highlighted problematic practices to staff. However, a number of factors reduced the programme's potential to impact gender inequity. Gender inequity was reproduced in the programme's enactment as female staff was undertaking a disproportionate amount of Athena SWAN work, with potential negative impacts on individual women's career progression. Early career researchers experienced problems accessing Athena SWAN initiatives. Furthermore, the impact of the programme was perceived to be undermined by wider institutional practices, national policies and societal norms, which are beyond the programme's remit.ConclusionsGender equity programmes have the potential to address inequity. However, paradoxically, they can also unintentionally reproduce and reinforce gender inequity through their enactment. Potential programme impacts may be undermined by barriers to staff availing of career development and training initiatives, and by wider institutional practices, national policies and societal norms.

Perceptions and experiences of a gender gap at a Canadian research institute and potential strategies to mitigate this gap: a sequential mixed-methods study

“…27 Our results also align with findings from a systematic review of interventions that mitigate gender bias in employment, which found bias against women being evaluated for positions that are traditionally or predominantly held by men. 28 This review identified strategies to mitigate this bias, including aiming for an applicant pool with at least 25% women, committing to the value of credentials before applicants are reviewed and training panel members in unconscious bias and the role that it can play in discussions and decisions.…”

Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review

“…Recent data from a realist evaluation show that the Athena SWAN program is perceived to have an important impact across participating universities but is associated with a heavy workload to fulfil its requirements. Further complicating this issue is that the workload is largely being shouldered by women, unintentionally reproducing gender inequity through its very enactment [53]. Establishing best practices for grant peer review to reduce gender bias will benefit from more supporting evidence.…”

Gender differences in Australasian ophthalmologists' experiences of the workplace

“…The Athena SWAN framework, introduced in the United Kingdom in 2005, aimed to address underrepresentation of women within STEMM careers through an awards scheme that promoted structural and cultural change within the higher education and research sector . The introduction of the program was associated with an increase in female representation in academic medicine posts . The program has been piloted in Australia as The Science in Australia Gender Equity (SAGE) initiative and has been adopted by over 50% of Australian academic institutes…”

“…23 The introduction of the program was associated with an increase in female representation in academic medicine posts. 26 The program has been piloted in Australia as The Science in Australia Gender Equity (SAGE) initiative and has been adopted by over 50% of Australian academic institutes. 23 Almost half of all respondents reported experiencing DBSH with female ophthalmologists nearly four times more likely to report discrimination and 50 times more likely to report sexual harassment compared to their male counterparts.…”