In this special section we seek to explore the relationship between emotions and virtuality. In particular, we are interested in understanding how emotions are constructed, modified or suppressed within the virtual environment.In the last few years there has been an overwhelming increase in the number of studies on virtual organizations and virtual teams (e.g. Jarvenpaa & Leidner, 1999;Lipnack & Stamps, 1997). Running parallel has been a vigorous interest in emotion in organizations (e.g. Domagalski, 1999;Fineman, 2006Fineman, , 2007. Rarely, however, have these streams of research met. This seems strange given the commonplace experience that working in a virtual environment is far from emotionally void. Virtual workplaces are sites where people bond, trust, love, get angry, frustrated, make friends, create enemies, shape their identities, confront their loneliness, feel oppressed or liberated.These are, of course, everyday happenings in the non-virtual organization. Virtual working, however, removes most, if not all, of the corporeal cues that have underpinned much of our understanding of the social construction of emotion, axiomatic to organizing and meaning making. Yet the rhetoric of virtuality is upbeat, a vision of a brave new world of organizational efficiency. The popular literature describes it as a communication intensive form of organizing that collapses conventional boundaries of space and time. It promises flexibility and responsiveness by shifting the work and expertise to as-needed bases through ever-evolving technologies. So organizations are increasingly investing in information tools with collaborative potentials, enabling them not only to take advantage of globally dispersed business partners and competent workforces, but also to transform themselves into virtual organizations. E-mail, mobile phones, video-conferencing, teleconferencing, as well as group support systems, web-based discussion 5 5 5 Human Relations