Gender Dynamics and Critical Reception: A Study of Early 20th-century Book Reviews from The New York Times

Abstract

This paper focuses on book reviews at the turn-of-the century United States in order to underline fundamental compatibilities between large-scale, computational methods and book historical approaches. It analyzes a dataset of approximately 2,800 book reviews published in The New York Times between January 1, 1905 and December 31, 1925. Several machine learning scenarios are employed to investigate how the underlying reviews constructed gendered norms for reading and readership. Logistic regression models are trained and tested to evaluate how effectively lemma frequencies predict the perceived or presumed gender of an author under review. The paper discusses four different feature selection scenarios, as follows: (1) No terms removed, (2) Stop words removed, (3) Stop words, gender nouns, and titles removed, and (4) Stop words, gender nouns, titles, and common forenames removed. For each scenario, the top lemma coefficients are discussed and interpreted. Tracing the norms (gendered and gendering) of The New York Times BookReview in the early twentieth century demonstrates that even the summary-driven book reviews played an important role in mediating hierarchies of taste and distinction. Further, the paper seeks to demonstrate that cultural analytics methods can be used to investigate a range of research questions related to authorship, publishing, circulation, and reception.

The General Linear Model and Minimal Research Compendiums: An Approach to Assure Statistical Validity in Digital Humanities Research

“…This allows us to model a binary variable where the values of the residuals form a binomial distribution. This has been used in a variety of digital humanities works but is rarely discussed as a generalized linear model (Blanke, 2018;Lavin, 2020;Roller, 2023). Nonetheless, by training humanities scholars in the GLM, it is easy to jump to this more advanced methodology.…”

The Generative Dissensus of Reading the Feminist Novel, 1995-2020: A Computational Analysis of Interpretive Communities

“…Matthew J. Lavin examines how the "crucial categorical norm" of gender influences critical reception and cultural capital by using machine learning and traditional book historical approaches to evaluate early twentieth-century New York Times book reviews. 24 Finding "gendered patterns in both subject matter and structural vocabularies of [these] book reviews," Lavin identifies a "division between 'what men write about' and 'what women write about' that has not been observed when primary texts such as novels were analyzed using large scale, computational methods." 25 Karen Bourrier and Mike Thelwall differently explore how gendered cultural expectations drive "the social lives of books" by comparing the incidence of women authors and female characters in Victorian literature on Goodreads, in the MLA International Bibliography, and on syllabi from the Open Syllabus Project.…”