2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender diversity and bank misconduct

Abstract: This paper investigates whether gender-diverse boards can play a role in preventing costly bank misconduct episodes. We exploit the fines received by European banks from US regulators to reduce endogeneity issues related to supervisory and governance mechanisms. We show that greater female representation significantly reduces the frequency of misconduct fines, equivalent to savings of $7.48 million per year. Female directors are more influential if they reach a critical mass and are supported by women in leade… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This led the authority to call for banks to implement all the necessary measures to achieve a more balanced composition not only of the boards but also of their managerial structures. Moreover, the study conducted by Arnaboldi et al (2021) examined the results of 83 listed banks in 21 European countries between 2007 and 2018. They analyzed 146 incidents of misconduct and the resulting sanctions imposed by U.S. regulators.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led the authority to call for banks to implement all the necessary measures to achieve a more balanced composition not only of the boards but also of their managerial structures. Moreover, the study conducted by Arnaboldi et al (2021) examined the results of 83 listed banks in 21 European countries between 2007 and 2018. They analyzed 146 incidents of misconduct and the resulting sanctions imposed by U.S. regulators.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the bonds between governance structure and corporate social responsibility are of paramount importance in terms of determining the strategic progression of the firm (Andreu-Pinillos et al In the latest years, more and more studies appeared concentrating on various aspects of the composition of boards of directors aiming to ascertain the determinants of efficacy for sound business management (Miglani et al, 2020). The abovementioned studies have focused on board's diversity from various angles be it gender (Kao et al, 2020), race (Field et al, 2020), professional background (Chen et al, 2020), and personal characteristics (Arnaboldi et al, 2020) to name only a few. As the vogue on all sustainability-related came to the forefront the corporate social responsibility as directed by internal governance structure acquired prominent positions in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related issue is that diversity does not matter until a critical mass is reached (Arnaboldi et al 2021). For the interest of the context in this chapter, one interpretation that cannot be ruled out with the data, is that there is insufficient variation in women representation in the sample frame to be able to capture any meaningful and potential impact.…”
Section: A Nudge Is Enough?mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, with regards to causal inference, the channel through which diversity can affect firm performance is still an open question, with many studies having essentially a reduced-form approach. Several hypotheses for potential channels include augmenting the monitoring role of the board (Adams and Ferreira 2009;Fama and Jensen 1983) and reducing litigation (Arnaboldi et al 2021).…”
Section: Inherent Limits To Causal Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation