Gender Disparity in Chest Radiology in North America

O’Neill, Siobhán; Maddu, Kiran; Jalal, Sabeena; Yeo, Sarah; Khurshid, Kiran; Qamar, Sadia; Nicolaou, Savas; Khosa, Faisal

doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.10.001

Cited by 11 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All included articles were written in English and published between 1989 and 2020 [6,7,11,12, (Figure 2). Most of the studies were conducted in the United States of America (USA) (n = 35) [7,11,73,74,77,[79][80][81][82][83][84][85]87,88,[90][91][92]94,95,97,100,102,103,[105][106][107][108][113][114][115][116]119,[122][123][124] alone or in collaboration with other countries (n = 12) [6,71,75,93,96,104,110,111,117,121,…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the articles appeared in Q1 journals (80.3%), with an impact factor ranging from 0 [12,72,98,100,104,118,127] to 7.931 [80,81,94,97]. The three most common journals were the American Journal of Roentgenology (i.e., 15 articles) [71,83,84,[86][87][88]90,95,96,105,107,111,114,121,125], the Journal of the American College of Radiology (i.e., 12 articles) [7,73,74,77,79,82,99,102,106,113,115,126], and Academic Radiology (i.e., nine articles) [11,[91][92][93]103,108,116,117,119].…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A woman was the first author in 45 (73.8%) articles [6,11,73,76,78,[80][81][82][83][84][86][87][88][89][90][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111]115,116,[118][119][120][121][122][123][125][126][127], the second in 27 (44.3%) [6,7,11,72,74,[77][78][79]…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In five out of the 61 included articles (8.2%), there were no women in a relevant position [12,71,75,100,101] (Table 1). Most of the articles appeared in Q1 journals (80.3%), with an impact factor ranging from 0 [12,72,98,100,104,118,127] to 7.931 [80,81,94,97]. The three most common journals were the American Journal of Roentgenology (i.e., 15 articles) [ Most of the articles appeared in Q1 journals (80.3%), with an impact factor ranging from 0 [12,72,98,100,104,118,127] to 7.931 [80,81,94,97].…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the articles appeared in Q1 journals (80.3%), with an impact factor ranging from 0 [12,72,98,100,104,118,127] to 7.931 [80,81,94,97]. The three most common journals were the American Journal of Roentgenology (i.e., 15 articles) [ Most of the articles appeared in Q1 journals (80.3%), with an impact factor ranging from 0 [12,72,98,100,104,118,127] to 7.931 [80,81,94,97]. The three most common journals were the American Journal of Roentgenology (i.e., 15 articles) [71,83,84,[86][87][88]90,95,96,105,107,111,114,121,125], the Journal of the American College of Radiology (i.e., 12 articles) [7,73,74,77,79,82,99,102,…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Is Empowerment of Female Radiologists Still Needed? Findings of a Systematic Review

Fichera

Busch

Rimondini

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Considering that radiology is still a male-dominated specialty in which men make up more than two thirds of the workforce, this systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current role of women in radiological imaging, focusing on the main aspects such as career progression, leadership, academic practice, and perceived discrimination. Three electronic databases were searched up to 21 October 2020. To identify additional records, weekly automatic email alerts were set up on PubMed until December 2020 and reference lists of key studies and included papers were screened. Two reviewers independently performed the search, study selection, quality appraisal, data extraction, and formal narrative synthesis. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer was involved. Across the 61 included articles, women worked more often part-time and held fewer positions of power in hospitals, on editorial boards, and at the academic level (associate and full professors). Women were less often in relevant positions in scientific articles, had fewer publications, and had a lower H-index. Discrimination and sexual harassment were experienced by up to 40% and 47% of female radiologists, respectively. Our study highlights that women in radiology are still underrepresented and play a marginal role in the field, struggling to reach top and leading positions.

show abstract

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the articles appeared in Q1 journals (80.3%), with an impact factor ranging from 0 [12,72,98,100,104,118,127] to 7.931 [80,81,94,97]. The three most common journals were the American Journal of Roentgenology (i.e., 15 articles) [ Most of the articles appeared in Q1 journals (80.3%), with an impact factor ranging from 0 [12,72,98,100,104,118,127] to 7.931 [80,81,94,97]. The three most common journals were the American Journal of Roentgenology (i.e., 15 articles) [71,83,84,[86][87][88]90,95,96,105,107,111,114,121,125], the Journal of the American College of Radiology (i.e., 12 articles) [7,73,74,77,79,82,99,102,…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations