Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from 19,130 Resumes in China

Abstract

provide their excellent research assistance. We graciously acknowledge the financial support from the third phase of Projects "211" and "985" at Xi'an Jiaotong University. All remaining errors are our own. ABSTRACTWe study gender discrimination in hiring markets by sending 19,130 fictitious matched resumes in response to professional employment advertisements posted on major Internet employment boards in China for positions such as engineers, accountants, secretaries, and marketing professionals in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Wuhan, and Chengdu. Our results show that, in general, stateowned firms tend to prefer male applicants. Foreign and private firms tend to prefer female applicants.On one hand, this evidence supports the hypothesis that economic reform and the market economy may mitigate gender discrimination. On the other hand, this evidence is consistent with statistics that describe discrimination based on gender segregation and information asymmetry that originated with higher ratios of female workers in foreign and private firms. With respect to regional income disparity, we find that the differences in gender discrimination between first-and second-tier cities are not significant. This result indicates that economic reform exerts limited mitigation effect on discrimination. We also find no evidence of taste discrimination based on traditional son preference in China.JEL: J71, O12

Employment discrimination in a former Soviet Union Republic: Evidence from a field experiment

“…Baert (2017) provides an extensive list of all correspondence studies since 2005, aimed at evaluating hiring discrimination in the labor market. In this list, the only representation of such studies for transition countries is a study for Poland (Wysienska and Karpinski, 2014), a study for the Czech republic (Bartos et al, 2016), and a couple of studies for China (Maurer-Fazio, 2012;Zhou et al, 2013;Maurer-Fazio and Lei, 2015). Nevertheless, none of these studies is as comprehensive in terms of the dimensions of discrimination measured (across multiple ethnic groups, and across genders) or in terms of the time span studied.…”

Exposure to female colleagues breaks the glass ceiling—Evidence from a combined vignette and field experiment

“…To the best of our knowledge, however, the question of whether peer exposure to female colleagues reduces the amount of discrimination has not been tested before. Finally, previous literature has identified a clear pattern, whereby gender discrimination covaries positively with the gender composition of the sector of employment (Albert et al 2011;Booth and Leigh 2010;Carlsson 2011;Correll et al 2007;Firth 1982;Guryan and Charles 2013;Levinson 1975;Neumark et al 1996;Petit 2007;Riach andRich 1987, 2006;Rich 2014;Weichselbaumer 2000;Zhou et al 2013). The Norwegian Armed Forces have fewer women in top positions than any other Norwegian sector, including the church (Teigen, 2014).…”

Employment Discrimination against Indigenous Peoples in the United States: Evidence from a Field Experiment

“…In the names survey, those with white names are seen as having been born in the United States 92.1% of the time in the national sample (96.0% of the time in the Arizona and New Mexico sample), relative to 64.8% for those with Navajo last names (72.3% in the Arizona and New Mexico sample.). 64 The studies with more job applications than us are: Neumark, Burn, and Button, (2019); Agan and Starr (2018); López Bóo, Rossi, and Urzúa (2013); Maurer-Fazio (2012); Maurer-Fazio and Lei (2015); and Zhou, Zhang, and Song (2013). Our records of the sample sizes (applications sent, unique jobs) for each study are available upon request.…”