1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00143-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences on the EPQ-R and attitudes to work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The gender effect was also weak on the five personality scales, some differences were found in N-Anx, Act, and ImpSS. These results were also consistent with previous reports in American college students (Zuckerman et al, 1993) and in other nations internationally (Barrett & Eysenck, 1984;Martin & Kirkcaldy, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The gender effect was also weak on the five personality scales, some differences were found in N-Anx, Act, and ImpSS. These results were also consistent with previous reports in American college students (Zuckerman et al, 1993) and in other nations internationally (Barrett & Eysenck, 1984;Martin & Kirkcaldy, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…3 An advantage of using the hierarchical factor model in (1) is that it permits the derivation of a coefficient giving the proportion of variance in the scale scores accounted for by a general factor-omega hierarchical (ω h ). More specifically, ω h is defined as ω h = 1'cc'1 1'S1 , where S is the observed variance/covariance Second, significant sex differences in which women score higher than men are often found on measures of neuroticism in general (e.g., Costa, Terracciano, & McCrae, 2001;McCrae et al, 2002) and on the EPQ in particular (e.g., Barrett & Eysenck, 1984;Martin & Kirkcaldy, 1998). However, an issue that is almost always neglected in psychological research is that group differences on a given scale only have a straightforward interpretation if that scale is measuring the same construct across the groups being compared (Horn & McArdle, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding has been replicated by Hojat, Glaser, Xu, Veloski, & Christian, (1999) in their sample of 1,157 medical students. Martin & Kirkcaldy (1998) and Heaven & Shochet (1995) also found higher Neuroticism for females than males in their samples of college students. In a cross-cultural study of Neuroticism, Lynn & Martin (1997) obtained higher means for women then for men on this factor across 37 nations.…”
Section: Gender Differences In Personalitymentioning
confidence: 86%