2009
DOI: 10.1080/01449290802332662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in website production and preference aesthetics: preliminary implications for ICT in education and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a key differentiation factor in the perception of websites is gender. Members of each gender have been found to prefer websites designed by the same gender (Moss & Gunn, 2009). This difference may affect the use of social networking sites as well.…”
Section: Gender Differences In Sns Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a key differentiation factor in the perception of websites is gender. Members of each gender have been found to prefer websites designed by the same gender (Moss & Gunn, 2009). This difference may affect the use of social networking sites as well.…”
Section: Gender Differences In Sns Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been argued that universal design guidelines are useful only to a certain extent, because aesthetic impressions vary substantially across individuals [16,15]. What someone finds appealing seems to depend on individual and demographic differences, such as personality, gender, or age [20,6,24,12]. To maximize website appeal for a given user, it would therefore be best to offer designs personalized to their individual visual preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to best of our knowledge, this is the first paper in e-commerce research that attempts to conceptualize the unexplored area of 3-D visualization in online shopping. Furthermore, the sample is biased (7 men, 26 women) especially when the research topic is relevant to aesthetics, which might be interfered by participant gender [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%