2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01604-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in wall shear–mediated brachial artery vasoconstriction and vasodilation

Abstract: Shear-mediated arterial vasodilation and vasoconstriction were more pronounced in women than in men, suggesting different gender-related sensitivity in the regulation of large-artery vascular tone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
77
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The timing of the revascularisation procedure may, at least in part, explain why diabetic women derived such a major benefit from the management strategy applied in our study compared with the management strategy applied in OASIS. Although several pathophysiological distinctions [20,21,22,23,24] have been reported between women and men, the fact that women seem to form fewer coronary collaterals than men [24] may be of great importance. Due to this lack of collaterals, women may benefit particularly from a rapid correction of the epicardial obstruction during UA/NSTEMI [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The timing of the revascularisation procedure may, at least in part, explain why diabetic women derived such a major benefit from the management strategy applied in our study compared with the management strategy applied in OASIS. Although several pathophysiological distinctions [20,21,22,23,24] have been reported between women and men, the fact that women seem to form fewer coronary collaterals than men [24] may be of great importance. Due to this lack of collaterals, women may benefit particularly from a rapid correction of the epicardial obstruction during UA/NSTEMI [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The absolute responses in FMD, however, were not different between the groups. Because our groups have significantly different baseline diameters, a possible better way to compare the FMD response is to express the diameter change relative to the trigger (i.e., the difference between maximal hyperemic flow velocity and resting flow velocity) (31,44). When the FMD/ ⌬shear rate as an index for endothelial function is considered, no significant differences between SCI and controls were found in the femoral artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies examining the impact of artery size on the shear-FMD relationship have variably reported the percent change (27) or the absolute change (22,61) in diameter to characterize FMD. Consensus has not yet been reached regarding the best index for expression of FMD, and current guidelines recommend reporting both percent and absolute changes (51).…”
Section: Between-artery Differences: Stimulus-response Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%