2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980016002925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in the prevalence of household food insecurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Our results confirm the existence of gender differences in reporting household food insecurity. Furthermore, they indicate that households headed by women constitute a segment of the population that is particularly vulnerable to food insecurity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

10
49
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(203 reference statements)
10
49
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, our study showed that gender was not associated with an increased risk of food insecurity. This is somewhat at odds with the results of other studies, which have explained the increased burden of food insecurity experienced by women to be associated with gender-related economic factors, including lower employment opportunities and child-related duties [36]. Additionally, higher educational attainment was independently associated with lower odds of experiencing food insecurity, which is consistent with other Australian research [8,12], and international studies of food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Interestingly, our study showed that gender was not associated with an increased risk of food insecurity. This is somewhat at odds with the results of other studies, which have explained the increased burden of food insecurity experienced by women to be associated with gender-related economic factors, including lower employment opportunities and child-related duties [36]. Additionally, higher educational attainment was independently associated with lower odds of experiencing food insecurity, which is consistent with other Australian research [8,12], and international studies of food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This concept is to ensure human rights for a healthy, accessible, and adequate diet, without compromising access to other essential needs, such as respecting healthy eating practises and cultural diversity, and should be socioeconomically and agro-ecologically sustainable (13) . Through this program, family farming from settlements should be supported in terms of sales to benefit socially vulnerable and marginalised populations, such as quilombolas (Afro-Brazilian ancestry), indigenous people, and for school feeding, entitled Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos (PAA) or Program for Food Acquisition in English (14) . In the present situation of poor access to healthy food in a highly vulnerable community, this program should work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review observed that female-headed households were 75% more likely to be food insecure than male-headed households. This could be because of the lower income earned by women compared to men due to the sex wage difference or reduced work time among women, the greater observation of household needs and food preparation among women than men (16) and the increased childcare burden shouldered by female household providers, such as feeding and education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9] Food insecurity among women is important, as female study respondents are generally more likely to report household food insecurity when compared with male respondents. 28 A 2017 metaanalysis found that female-headed households were 75% more likely to be food insecure than male-headed households (95% CI 49-96). 28 Although the relationship between poverty and food insecurity among women has been well established, [29][30][31][32] food insecurity specifically among women of color, holding income constant, is emerging in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 A 2017 metaanalysis found that female-headed households were 75% more likely to be food insecure than male-headed households (95% CI 49-96). 28 Although the relationship between poverty and food insecurity among women has been well established, [29][30][31][32] food insecurity specifically among women of color, holding income constant, is emerging in the literature. Women from Pacific Islander, AI/AN, and refugee communities are currently underrepresented in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%