Gender differences in the factor structure of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in multinational general population surveys

Abstract

Background Most gender-specific studies of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) have focused on gender differences in thresholds for hazardous drinking. This study examines gender differences in the factor structure of the AUDIT in general-population surveys. Methods General-population surveys from 15 countries provided 27,478 current drinkers’ responses to the AUDIT and related measures. We used single-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to evaluate goodness-of-fit of three hypothesized models for responses to the AUDIT by men and women in each country. Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) using a maximum likelihood robust (MLR) estimator was evaluated to identify the best fitted model. We then assessed factorial invariance within country surveys where fit indices were acceptable for both genders. Gender-specific internal consistency and concurrent validity were also evaluated in all 15 countries. Results: CFA revealed that the fit indices of 2-factor or 3-factor models were consistently better than fit indices for a 1-factor model in 14 of 15 countries. Comparisons of BIC values indicated that the 2-factor solution was the best fitted model. Factorial invariance tests in data from 3 countries indicated that the factor loadings and thresholds of the AUDIT were invariant across gender. The internal reliability and concurrent validity of AUDIT and its subscales were acceptable in both genders. Conclusions A two-factor model best describes AUDIT responses across general-population surveys in 12 of 15 countries, with acceptable internal reliability and concurrent validity, and supports a gender-invariant structure in at least three of those countries.

High rates of police detention among recently released HIV-infected prisoners in Ukraine: Implications for health outcomes

“…DSM-IV criteria were used to measure opioid dependence. We used validated AUDIT cut-offs for men (≥8) and women (≥4) for hazardous drinking (Allen et al, 2001; Neumann et al, 2004; Peng et al, 2012), and ≥20 for dependence (Babor et al, 2001). A cut-off of ≥ 3 was used on the DAST-10 to define moderate to high drug abuse severity (Skinner, 1982).…”

The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): A review of graded severity algorithms and national adaptations

“…Peng et al (2012) examined the factor structure of the AUDIT as applied in general population surveys conducted in 15 countries (N = 27,478). A two-factor model representing consumption and dependence/consequences provided the best fit to the data.…”

The effect of sample selection on the distinction between alcohol abuse and dependence

“…With regard to the revision of the diagnostic system, our findings do not support the combination of abuse and dependence into a single diagnostic category of alcohol use disorder. Critique of the single category also came from two recent studies that found two distinct dimensions of alcohol-related problems assessed with the symptom items of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT; Peng, Wilsnack, Kristjanson, Benson, & Wilsnack, 2012;Rist, Glockner-Rist, & Demmel, 2009 …”