2016
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2016.16224abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in the contribution patterns of equity-crowdfunding investors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings add to the literature that regards the crowd as a heterogeneous community and aims to identify differences in behavior (Hornuf and Schmitt 2016;Hervé et al 2019;Mohammadi and Shafi 2018;Günther et al 2018). With respect to crowdinvestors' motivations, our results confirm previous research that crowdfunders are not exclusively motivated by financial returns but also by pro-social or community motives (Gerber et al 2012;Belleflamme et al 2014;Bretschneider and Leimeister 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings add to the literature that regards the crowd as a heterogeneous community and aims to identify differences in behavior (Hornuf and Schmitt 2016;Hervé et al 2019;Mohammadi and Shafi 2018;Günther et al 2018). With respect to crowdinvestors' motivations, our results confirm previous research that crowdfunders are not exclusively motivated by financial returns but also by pro-social or community motives (Gerber et al 2012;Belleflamme et al 2014;Bretschneider and Leimeister 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These findings give reason to assume that the "crowd" is not a homogeneous community and some studies on crowdinvesting started to segregate the crowd. Hervé et al (2019) and Mohammadi and Shafi (2018) show that female crowdinvestors behave more risk averse than male ones, while Hornuf and Schmitt (2016) and Günther et al (2018) show that a local bias exists among crowdinvestors. Furthermore, Wallmeroth (2019) reports that large pledges (more than EUR 5000) at Companisto make up 3.2% of all pledges but account for about half of the raised funds.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between Phase II and III is that investors are motivated to follow other investors' decisions instead of evaluating the quality of projects. The funding accumulated in the earlier stages attracts a large number of investors by enhancing collective intelligence (Yum et al 2012), reducing uncertainty (Colombo et al 2015); causing information cascades (Vismara 2016b); and leading to herding behaviours (Liu et al 2015;Mohammadi and Shafi 2018). The selfreinforcing mechanism is triggered by the fact that members in the virtual communities affect others' decision-making.…”
Section: Crowdfunding Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female are more risk averse than male. Apart from that, the male investor also follow the pattern of investment in the project that has the majority of male investor (Mohammadi and Shafi, 2018).…”
Section: Gender and Investment Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%