2018
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in temporomandibular disorders in adult populational studies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate gender differences in the prevalence of TMD. A systematic review was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and LILACS in duplicate by two independent reviewers. The inclusion criteria were cross-sectional studies that reported the prevalence of TMD for men and women and that used the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I group diagnostic criteria:(group I = muscle disorders; group II = disc displacements; g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

31
231
2
19

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
31
231
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…While epidemiological data from both population and clinical setting showed a clear preponderance of women in the reproductive age presenting with TMD signs and/or symptoms, results from the OPPERA investigation did not find a greater rate of TMD symptoms among women as compared to men; similarly, the incidence rate of clinically verified TMDs was only marginally greater in females. In addition to the OPPERA study, a systematic review has also reported a total of 112 candidate genes specifically and significantly related to TMDs, explaining why a sex difference in TMD susceptibility may be observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…While epidemiological data from both population and clinical setting showed a clear preponderance of women in the reproductive age presenting with TMD signs and/or symptoms, results from the OPPERA investigation did not find a greater rate of TMD symptoms among women as compared to men; similarly, the incidence rate of clinically verified TMDs was only marginally greater in females. In addition to the OPPERA study, a systematic review has also reported a total of 112 candidate genes specifically and significantly related to TMDs, explaining why a sex difference in TMD susceptibility may be observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This observation may also apply in other countries. Yet, it should be borne in mind that the risk of adult females developing TMD is greater than among males . Considering the aforementioned statements and the elevated TMD prevalence during adolescence, there is a high possibility that orthodontists and dentists will encounter patients with pre‐existing TMD who seek therapy for their malocclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the prevalence of TMDs, epidemiological data have shown that women are at higher risk than men of developing TMD, as well as of having more inflammation, facial pain and sensitivity in the masticatory muscles and TMJ. The same scenario was observed in the compilation of the data in the present review, where 408 patients were women and 101 were men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%