2011
DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2011.556123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in student performance in large lecture classrooms using personal response systems (‘clickers’) with narrative case studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation of this study is the unequal distribution of male and female participants (40 out of 44 participants were women), as previous studies have found gender differences with clicker use. For example, Kang and colleagues (Kang, Lundeberg, Wolter, delMas, & Herreid, 2012) compared traditional lectures with clicker activities in introductory biology classes and found that women performed equally well or better when using clickers, whereas men performed better with lecture-based instruction. It is possible that current findings reflect the greater number of female participants than male participants.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Another limitation of this study is the unequal distribution of male and female participants (40 out of 44 participants were women), as previous studies have found gender differences with clicker use. For example, Kang and colleagues (Kang, Lundeberg, Wolter, delMas, & Herreid, 2012) compared traditional lectures with clicker activities in introductory biology classes and found that women performed equally well or better when using clickers, whereas men performed better with lecture-based instruction. It is possible that current findings reflect the greater number of female participants than male participants.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although some studies (e.g., Humphries and Whelan, 2009) found that the use of the clickers improved students' perceived learning and the interactive nature of the technology made it appealing, it was also observed that there is limited evidence to support the astounding improvement in student learning that emerges with the use of the clickers. Some studies (e.g., Kang et al, 2012) have explored the gender effects on the use of clickers and their subsequent impacts on respondents. However, the results are still largely inconclusive.…”
Section: Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies suggest that students' gender and race do not influence their efficacy and use of clicker technology, and hence it may be considered equally beneficial to a wide population of students (MacGeorge et al, 2008). Other studies report that female students are particularly positive about the use of clicker technology, and use of such technology was found more favorable for women (Kang et al, 2012). These studies indicate that female students tend to participate better using clicker technology than the male students (e.g., King and Joshi, 2008).…”
Section: Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the gender issue; studies have found gender differences in clicker use. Kang, Lundeberg, Wolter, delMas, and Herreid () indicated that females performed better when using clickers, whereas males performed better with lecture‐based instruction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%