2004
DOI: 10.1080/02813430310003264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in risk factor control and treatment profile in diabetes: a study in 229 Swedish primary health care centres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
40
3
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(9 reference statements)
9
40
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Metabolic control was only slightly different between sexes, but tended to be worse in women. Thus, we did not confirm previous studies showing that men have lower HbA 1c levels and/or fewer episodes of ketonuria [21]. Such results were claimed to be a consequence of more intensive care for men [22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Metabolic control was only slightly different between sexes, but tended to be worse in women. Thus, we did not confirm previous studies showing that men have lower HbA 1c levels and/or fewer episodes of ketonuria [21]. Such results were claimed to be a consequence of more intensive care for men [22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In a recent Swedish crosssectional survey female patients with diabetes had less favourable risk-factor control than corresponding male patients [20], an association which was also found in a recent Finnish meta-analysis [26]. However, this could not completely explain the higher mortality risk of diabetic female patients in our study, as this relation remained significant when adjusted for other risk factors.…”
Section: Meaning Of the Studycontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Less than optimal blood pressure control was also observed, as was described earlier in our study sample (8). There seem to be differences in risk factor control between sexes with both hypertension and type 2 diabetes that need further research to be understood (17). Thus, there are subgroups of patients with a substantial increase in risk, and special concern should be directed at them to individualize and intensify their treatment to improve prognosis (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%