1992
DOI: 10.1177/016224399201700406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Responses to News about Science and Technology

Abstract: Women and men respond differently to mock news stories about new developments in science and technology, with women associating more risk (p ≤ .05) and less benefit (p ≤ .05) than do men with reported developments overall. Interview data were used to construct a survey instrument designed to probe for differences in underlying attitudes that might explain this outcome. Results from administration of the questionnaire reveal that women are more likely than men to agree with "antiscience" statements. The a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age was also positively related to concern about BPA (p < .01). Compared with men, women expressed greater concern about BPA and were more likely to report individual behaviors (p < .05 for each)-a pattern that fits with previous findings of differences across gender in reservations and risks perceptions regarding science and technology (Hornig, 1992;Liu & Priest, 2005;. Neither self-identification as African American nor self-identification as Hispanic was significantly related to any of the dependent variables.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Age was also positively related to concern about BPA (p < .01). Compared with men, women expressed greater concern about BPA and were more likely to report individual behaviors (p < .05 for each)-a pattern that fits with previous findings of differences across gender in reservations and risks perceptions regarding science and technology (Hornig, 1992;Liu & Priest, 2005;. Neither self-identification as African American nor self-identification as Hispanic was significantly related to any of the dependent variables.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Many studies have documented differences between men's and women's practices and achievement in science and have provided explanations ranging from social psychological to structural arguments: the role of gender ideology in the construction of science (Fox Keller, 1995), cultural differences (Gilbert, Crettaz von Roten & Alvarez, 2006;Hornig, 1992), the lack of women role models and stereotyped images of women scientists (Steinke, 1997(Steinke, , 2005, discrimination in promotion and allocation procedures (Frank Fox, 1995;Wenneras & Wold, 1997), problems with reconciling the reality of one's biological clock, and the ideal temporality of one's career (Frank Fox, 1995). Poliakoff and Webb (2007) have identified three factors that predict scientists' intentions toward public outreach and engagement activities: attitudes toward such activities, perceived behavioral control, and descriptive norm.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it happens, women display less affinity with natural science and technology and stronger environmental concern, both of which suggest weaker rationalism. Moreover, those low levels of rationalism among women are not limited to the public at large (Blocker andEckberg 1989, 1997;Hornig 1992), but also apply to life scientists (Barke, Jenkins-Smith, and Slovic 1997) and political elites (Cohen 1997). So, the stronger affinity with New Age among women as compared with men might be attributable to weaker rationalism.…”
Section: Education and Gender As Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%