2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-010-0589-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces for industrial workers observed after twenty years

Abstract: The similarity of gender differences between the guideline and the present findings was coupled with dramatic decreases in MAWs of lifting, lowering, and carrying. Such decreases may reflect a new psychophysical set point; however, considerations about adjusting existing guidelines on lifting, lowering, and carrying may not be appropriate until additional data from other sources inside and outside the US confirm the present findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prescripts that were to be given to the participants was similar to that suggested by [61]; where the participants on their own selected the MAWL efficiently which they could lift under a particular condition for eight hours every workday “without straining themselves or without becoming unusually tired, weakened, overheated, or out of breath”. Numerous researchers [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69] recommended that the psychophysical method is a credible technique to evaluate the perceived exertion through the manual materials handling (MMH) task in low and moderate frequencies (<6 lifts/min).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prescripts that were to be given to the participants was similar to that suggested by [61]; where the participants on their own selected the MAWL efficiently which they could lift under a particular condition for eight hours every workday “without straining themselves or without becoming unusually tired, weakened, overheated, or out of breath”. Numerous researchers [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69] recommended that the psychophysical method is a credible technique to evaluate the perceived exertion through the manual materials handling (MMH) task in low and moderate frequencies (<6 lifts/min).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators (Mital, 1984;Snook and Ciriello, 1991;Ciriello et al, 1993;Ayoub and Woldstad, 1999;Ciriello et al, 2011;Fischer and Dickerson, 2014;Fox and Smith, 2014;Pinder and Boocock, 2014) suggested that the psychophysical approach is a reliable method in assessing the perceived exertion during manual material handling (MMH) task in low and moderate frequencies (<6 lifts/min).…”
Section: Experimental Sessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the maximum weight a participant could lift repetitively according to her/his perception, without overexertion or fatigue for a given lifting condition (Mital, 1984;Snook and Ciriello, 1991;Ciriello et al, 1993;Ayoub and Woldstad, 1999;Ciriello et al, 2011;Fischer and Dickerson, 2014;Fox and Smith, 2014;Pinder and Boocock, 2014).…”
Section: Maximum Acceptable Weight Of Lift (Mawl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ciriello et al [57,58] reported that the average maximum acceptable torque (MAT) for males was between 1.15 and 1.88 N m, with an approximate ratio of 15-35% relative to maximal isometric torque. For females, the MAT was between 0.33 and 0.65 N m with ratios of 14-24%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%