2005
DOI: 10.1080/0300443042000270786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in musical aptitude, rhythmic ability and motor performance in preschool children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
21
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
21
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The results corresponded with Pollatou et al, 2005, Butterfield et al, (2002 and with Zachopoulou and Makri (2005), who argued that the 'gender' factor does not affect kinetic development. Urlich (2000), on locomotor skills, lists a common table in the age norms of gender, while in manipulative skills for the calculation of the kinetic performance he distinguishes the two sexes, reinforcing the view that there is no difference between sexes at least in locomotor skills.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results corresponded with Pollatou et al, 2005, Butterfield et al, (2002 and with Zachopoulou and Makri (2005), who argued that the 'gender' factor does not affect kinetic development. Urlich (2000), on locomotor skills, lists a common table in the age norms of gender, while in manipulative skills for the calculation of the kinetic performance he distinguishes the two sexes, reinforcing the view that there is no difference between sexes at least in locomotor skills.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…As Hardy et al (2009), Linovena et al (2011 and Piek et al, (2012) support the acquisition of basic motor skills differs depending on gender, while Pollatou et al (2005) argues that there is no difference in gender in relation to motor development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the differences in means and especially the larger standard deviations can be explained by the fact that the Greek sample was obtained from a large cross-section of schools, classrooms, and school settings and thus was probably more heterogeneous than the original norming sample, which consisted of a single suburban school district in the northeastern United States. Standard deviations for the Tonal and Rhythm subtests reported by Pollatou et al (2005) for their Greek sample also exceeded the American norms. Statistical tests comparing the U.S. and Greek samples without the rural data revealed that the Greek urban and suburban composite means were significantly higher than the respective U.S. means for grades 2 and 3 but were not significantly different for kindergarten or grade 1.…”
Section: Journal Of Research In Music Educationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The current investigation focused on use of the PMMA in Greece. One study (Pollatou, Karidimou, & Gerodimos, 2005) involved use of the PMMA in Greece with a sample of 5-and 6-year olds (N = 95). The authors reported descriptive results for the PMMA as follows: Tonal subtest (M = 22.68, SD = 5.78), Rhythm subtest (M = 22.62, SD = 4.64).…”
Section: Journal Of Research In Music Education 58(1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these assessments are difficult to transfer to all fields of physical activity and sport since these tests are based on specialized populations of dancers (Šebić et al, 2012), computerized instruments (Iannarilli et al, 2013; Iannarilli, Vannozzi, Iosa, Pesce, & Capranica, 2013), or in children (Derri et al, 2001). In addition, the studies analyzed each separately (Pollatou, Karadimou, & Gerodimos, 2005). Hence, these types of measurements have limited a applicability for several reasons: (a) difficulty of access to the instrumentation, (b) high associated costs; (c) specificity of tests by dance specific and (d) do not imply movement synchronized with music.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%