2011
DOI: 10.1080/09571730903545251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in motivation and L2 accent attainment: an investigation of young Kurdish learners of Turkish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with earlier research findings indicating that female learners are more motivated to learn a foreign language (Ghazvini & Khajehpour, 2011;Dörnyei, Csizér, & Németh, 2006;Skolverket, 2006;Mori & Gobel, 2006). However, there have been several studies illustrating supportive evidence for the higher motivation levels of male language learners (Al-Bustan & Al-Bustan, 2009;Polat, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This finding is consistent with earlier research findings indicating that female learners are more motivated to learn a foreign language (Ghazvini & Khajehpour, 2011;Dörnyei, Csizér, & Németh, 2006;Skolverket, 2006;Mori & Gobel, 2006). However, there have been several studies illustrating supportive evidence for the higher motivation levels of male language learners (Al-Bustan & Al-Bustan, 2009;Polat, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Many studies reported the superiority of female learners in L2 motivation over male learners and that male and female learners possess different types of L2 motivation (Ghazvini & Khajehpour, 2011;Henry, 2010;Mori & Gobel, 2006;Sung & Padilla, 1998;Williams, Burden, & Lanvers, 2002). Only few studies (Al-Bustan & Al-Bustan, 2009;Polat, 2011) showed opposite results. For example, Polat's (2011) study on middle and high school Kurdish learners of Turkish reported the superiority of the male participants in two motivational orientations (identification and integrated orientations) over the female participants.…”
Section: L2 Motivation and Learner Variablesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example, Polat's (2011) study on middle and high school Kurdish learners of Turkish reported the superiority of the male participants in two motivational orientations (identification and integrated orientations) over the female participants. These two motivational orientations were defined by Polat (2011) as demonstrating 'more autonomy in determining and manipulating their own actions' (p. 21). Another study which showed higher motivation of males over females is Al-Bustan and Al-Bustan's (2009) research on Kuwaiti learners of English.…”
Section: L2 Motivation and Learner Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research data indicate that female learners tend to score higher than male learners on different measures of language achievement, such as accuracy in oral production (Chavez, ), general English proficiency test (Główka, ), judgements of accents in terms of likeness to native speakers (Polat, ), lexical availability (Fernandez Fontecha, ), and vocabulary production tests (Jimenez Catalan, ). Further, Chavez's () review of studies looking at gender and achievement confirmed that females outperformed males in placement tests and were graded more highly, although she also concluded that “as far as assessments in experimental settings are concerned, the female advantage is much less clear” (Chavez, : 67).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%