1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00165-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in molecular remodeling in pressure overload hypertrophy

Abstract: There are significant gender differences in the LV adaptation to pressure overload despite a similar degree of LVH and systolic wall stress in male and female rats. There is the potential for estrogen signaling through the adult myocyte estrogen receptor in both male and female rats to contribute to gender differences in gene expression in pathologic hypertrophy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
116
1
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
13
116
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The remodeling process accelerated the progression to heart failure, characterized by significant chamber dilation and a decrease in the ratio of wall thickness to chamber diameter (h/r) by 6 months of age. However, the progression to failure was delayed in females (37), indicating that, despite a similar degree of LV hypertrophy between males and females, there were significant gender differences in the LV-adaptive response to pathological hypertrophy and depressed function, similar to recent studies in the TNF-␣ overexpression model and in a rat model of pressure overload hypertrophy (38). The etiology of these differences is unclear but may be related to: (a) a reduced adaptive hypertrophic reserve in males (39); (b) the lower mitochondria respiratory and lysosomal enzyme activity in females (40); (c) a higher percentage of the V1 myosin isozyme, which is up-regulated by estrogen in females (41); and (d) the intrinsic gender-specific differences in cardiac muscle physiology and biochemistry (42).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The remodeling process accelerated the progression to heart failure, characterized by significant chamber dilation and a decrease in the ratio of wall thickness to chamber diameter (h/r) by 6 months of age. However, the progression to failure was delayed in females (37), indicating that, despite a similar degree of LV hypertrophy between males and females, there were significant gender differences in the LV-adaptive response to pathological hypertrophy and depressed function, similar to recent studies in the TNF-␣ overexpression model and in a rat model of pressure overload hypertrophy (38). The etiology of these differences is unclear but may be related to: (a) a reduced adaptive hypertrophic reserve in males (39); (b) the lower mitochondria respiratory and lysosomal enzyme activity in females (40); (c) a higher percentage of the V1 myosin isozyme, which is up-regulated by estrogen in females (41); and (d) the intrinsic gender-specific differences in cardiac muscle physiology and biochemistry (42).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…5 For patients undergoing CABG, congestive heart failure has been shown to account for the excess mortality in women, 2 and congestive heart failure is an independent predictor of mortality in both women and men in BARI and other revascularization studies. 5,6 Compelling evidence implicates a higher incidence of hypertensive heart disease, a steeper pressure-volume relationship, and more diastolic dysfunction 12 in women in comparison with men and is supported by reports of sex differences in molecular remodeling in pressure overload hypertrophy 13 and in cardiac adaptation to isolated systolic hypertension. 14 It has been postulated that the hypertrophied left ventricle is less able to withstand transient periods of ischemia and volume shifts and comparatively higher contrast loads (corrected for smaller size in women) associated with revascularization.…”
Section: In-hospital Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Alternatively, an intrinsic di erence between the male and female rat heart may exist, and thus selectively in¯uence the pattern of cardiac remodelling. In fact, a recent study by Weinberg et al (1999) demonstrated signi®cant gender di erences in cardiac remodelling and ventricular function, despite a similar degree of left ventricular hypertrophy and systolic wall stress.…”
Section: British Journal Of Pharmacology Vol 136 (5)mentioning
confidence: 97%