2017
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in long‐term survival post‐transplant: A single‐institution analysis in the lung allocation score era

Abstract: Purpose To clarify the significance of recipient gender status on lung transplant outcomes in a large single institution experience spanning three decades. Methods We analyzed data from all lung transplants performed in our institution since 1986. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the effect of recipient characteristics on survival and BOS score ≥1-free survival. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association of gender with short term graft functio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the pre-lung allocation score era, female gender was not connected with better survival. Female recipients showed considerably improved survival rate over five years compared to males [17]. However, there are some suggestions that the impressive long-term graft survival benefit of male donor-female recipient versus female donor-male recipient, and of male donor-female recipient versus matched groups (male-male, female-female) in transplant, can be resulted from some donor quality and recipient characteristics as the confounding elements [18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pre-lung allocation score era, female gender was not connected with better survival. Female recipients showed considerably improved survival rate over five years compared to males [17]. However, there are some suggestions that the impressive long-term graft survival benefit of male donor-female recipient versus female donor-male recipient, and of male donor-female recipient versus matched groups (male-male, female-female) in transplant, can be resulted from some donor quality and recipient characteristics as the confounding elements [18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reports suggest that there would be a different prevalence of this disease in various areas of the world. In Europe and the USA, most cases are secondary to bone marrow and lung transplantations; in the southern cone of South America, main cases are secondary to infections, especially due to AV. As we will discuss later, these differences may be due to the adenovirus serotypes in the different areas and to a genetic predisposition inherent in the local population.…”
Section: History and Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pre-lung allocation score era, female gender was not connected with better survival. Female recipients showed considerably improved survival over five years compared to males (17). However, there are some suggestions that the impressive long-term graft survival benefit of male donor-female recipient versus female donor-male recipient and of male donor-female recipient versus matched groups (male-male, female-female) in transplant can be the result of some donor quality and recipient characteristics as the confounding elements (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%