2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70578-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Laterality on a Dichotic Task: The Influence of Report Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they support the view of Voyer and Flight (2001) in that the gender difference in hemispheric lateralization of language function is observed in a well-managed-attention condition, which fits the condition adopted in the MMN measurement; subjects are required to focus attention to a distraction task and thereby ignore the phonetic stimuli that elicit MMN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, they support the view of Voyer and Flight (2001) in that the gender difference in hemispheric lateralization of language function is observed in a well-managed-attention condition, which fits the condition adopted in the MMN measurement; subjects are required to focus attention to a distraction task and thereby ignore the phonetic stimuli that elicit MMN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These results underscore the significance of considering the gender differences in the study of MMN, especially when phonetic stimulus is adopted. Moreover, they support the view of Voyer and Flight [Voyer, D., Flight, J., 2001. Gender differences in laterality on a dichotic task: the influence of report strategies.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnitude of the right‐ear advantage may vary between groups, but it is common from childhood (e.g., Fennell, Satz & Morris, ; Hirnstein, Westerhausen, Korsnes & Hugdahl, ; Hugdahl, Carlsson & Eichele, ) and persists into older age (e.g., Gootjes, Van Strien & Bouma, ; Takio, Koivisto, Jokiranta et al ., ; Westerhausen, Bless & Kompus, ). It can be found for both sexes (Hirnstein et al ., ; Voyer, ; Voyer & Flight, ) and for right‐ and left‐handers (Bryden, ; Dos Santos Sequeira, Woerner, Walter et al ., ; Foundas, Corey, Hurley & Heilman, ). The right‐ear advantage for verbal material is present in language families as different as the Germanic languages English (e.g., Arciuli, Rankine & Monaghan, ), German (e.g., Westerhausen et al ., ), and Norwegian (e.g., Kompus, Specht, Ersland et al ., ); Finno‐Ugric languages Finnish (Takio et al ., ) and Estonian (Westerhausen et al ., ); Romanic languages Italian (Brancucci, Della Penna, Babiloni et al ., ), French (Bedoin, Ferragne & Marsico, ), and Spanish (Gadea, Marti‐Bonmatí, Arana, Espert, Salvador & Casanova et al ., ), as well as in Japanese (Tanaka, Kanzaki, Yoshibayashi, Kamiya & Sugishita, ), Turkish (Bayazıt, Öniz, Hahn, Güntürkün & Özgören, ), Mandarin Chinese, and Hindi (Bless et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%