2008
DOI: 10.1080/01638530802073712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

55
441
12
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 575 publications
(550 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
55
441
12
9
Order By: Relevance
“…However, although we found strong evidence for language style matching in zero-acquaintance small groups (consistent with others' findings; Niederhoffer & Pennebaker, 2002;Newman et al, 2008), LSM was unrelated to post-conversation PD decisions. The LSM results are surprising in view of other work (Gonzales et al, 2010;Ireland & Pennebaker, 2010;Ireland et al, 2011) performance, romantic relationships, even long-term scholarly collaborations) can be predicted using the same language style matching (LSM) metric (Gonzales et al, 2010) that we applied to our data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, although we found strong evidence for language style matching in zero-acquaintance small groups (consistent with others' findings; Niederhoffer & Pennebaker, 2002;Newman et al, 2008), LSM was unrelated to post-conversation PD decisions. The LSM results are surprising in view of other work (Gonzales et al, 2010;Ireland & Pennebaker, 2010;Ireland et al, 2011) performance, romantic relationships, even long-term scholarly collaborations) can be predicted using the same language style matching (LSM) metric (Gonzales et al, 2010) that we applied to our data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Because we found, consistent with other research (e.g. Newman et al, 2008), some sex differences in function word use (e.g. compared to men, women used more auxiliary verbs [13.6% vs. 11.9%, Cohen's d = 0.58, p = 0.004]), we also ran the correlation analyses separately for the two sexes.…”
Section: Language Style Matchingsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Newman, Groom, Handelman, and Pennebaker (2008) found that women tend to write messages pertaining to psychological process, social process, and verbs. The use of pronouns and social words are commonly found in their text messages.…”
Section: Female's Language Use In Smsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence this paper investigates the linguistic and discoursal features in English SMS created by university students, especially females, to gain a better understanding of their language of text messaging. Previous studies have mostly focused on the differences between male and female texters (Al Rousan, Aziz & Christopher 2011;Balakrishnan & Yeow 2008;Bassam 2014;Heidari & Alibabaee 2013;Keong et al 2012;Newman 2008;Rafi 2008). Seeing that women's language is seen as inferior and something that stands out from the norm (Coates 1988, as cited in Jakobsson 2010, p. 2), it is deemed important to conduct this study that specifically focused on female texters to fill in the gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage is calculated by dividing the sum of a category by the word count resulting in the following output: function (40%), article (20%), verb (20%), auxiliary verb (20%), present tense (20%), affection (20%), positive (20%), perception (20%), visual (20%), relative (40%), and time words (40%). LIWC has been used in numerous studies, covering a wide range of topics which included predicting deception from textual words [12], identifying gender differences in language use [13] and the use of language to identify personality styles [14]. It was also used to reveal the psychological changes in response to an attack, for example, the terrorist attack on 9 September 2001 in the United States [15].…”
Section: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Countmentioning
confidence: 99%