2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.07.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in knee abduction during weight-bearing activities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous studies [7,15,24,27] observed sex-specific differences in frontal and sagittal plane knee joint kinematics, the present findings indicate no main effect of sex, as well as no interaction effects with sex. It might be possible that the expertise of our female participants in DJ performance (i. e., DJ screening for inclusion that caused a more homogenous group of participants; no sex-specific differences in DJ heights) could have affected their sagittal and frontal plane knee joint motion behavior in a sense that they were able to prevent knee joint kinematics that potentially increase risk of injury during DJs.…”
Section: Interaction Of Surface and Drop-height Condition On Jump Percontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…Although previous studies [7,15,24,27] observed sex-specific differences in frontal and sagittal plane knee joint kinematics, the present findings indicate no main effect of sex, as well as no interaction effects with sex. It might be possible that the expertise of our female participants in DJ performance (i. e., DJ screening for inclusion that caused a more homogenous group of participants; no sex-specific differences in DJ heights) could have affected their sagittal and frontal plane knee joint motion behavior in a sense that they were able to prevent knee joint kinematics that potentially increase risk of injury during DJs.…”
Section: Interaction Of Surface and Drop-height Condition On Jump Percontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…One explanation for this may be attributed to differences in the magnitude of peak knee abduction between men and women. In line with previous research in women with an intact ACL [26], and women with ACL deficiency [41], we found women to exhibit greater knee abduction compared to men in both functional tasks. This result indicates gender differences in frontal plane knee movements after ACLR, which may contribute to the risk of sustaining a second ACL injury in women [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Pearson's correlation coefficient (continuous data: age, BMI, time since ACLR), Spearman's rank correlation (ordinal data: activity level), and independent T-tests (binary variables: injury data) were used to investigate associations between participant characteristics and peak knee abduction to identify possible covariates for the regression analyses. Since uninjured females seem to have both reduced hip strength [25], different muscle activity patterns [10] and greater knee abduction angles during activity [26] when compared with their male counterparts, separate analyses were performed for men and women.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the authors found larger knee valgus angles during drop landings in females vs. males. Most recently, Cronström et al [9] confirmed the reported sex-specific effects on knee valgus angles during jump-landing tasks in a systematic review and meta-analysis. More precisely, women experienced larger knee valgus movements compared to men during motor tasks such as jump landings, running, and cutting which indicates sex-specific strategies for knee injury prevention [9].…”
Section: Knee Joint Angles In Sagittal and Frontal Planementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Several kinematic measures such as insufficient knee flexion [10,30] and/or excessive knee valgus [21,30] appear to be responsible for an increased risk of sustaining non-contact ACL injuries during jump-landing tasks. Further, it has been demonstrated that factors such as fatigue [6,28,33,39], surface condition [1,29,36], and sex [6,9,36] may impair sagittal and frontal plane knee joint kinematics during jumping and landing tasks. In this regard, the findings of the present study showed that fatigue produced significant decreases in knee flexion angles during DJs (i. e., more extended legs) in elite volleyball players.…”
Section: Knee Joint Angles In Sagittal and Frontal Planementioning
confidence: 99%