2019
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in incidence and in-hospital outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in Spain, 2001–15

Abstract: Background we aim to examine trends in the incidence of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among women and men in Spain from 2001 to 2015; compare in-hospital outcomes for mechanical and bioprosthetic SAVR by gender and; to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM) after SAVR. Methods We performed a retrospective study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database, 2001–15. We included patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study suggested that women had more vascular complications and blood transfusions than men and were more likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility, nursing home, or intermediate care centre (15). A higher IHM in women was also registered in the 2019 study from Lopéz-de-Andrés et al where they stated that females had significantly higher IHM irrespective of all the comorbid conditions analysed (16). These results differ from some older studies that, after adjustment of the results, did not show a significant difference in IHM and suggest that there is no greater than a 2.5-fold increase in risk for females compared with males undergoing AVR.…”
Section: Savr: In-hospital and 30-day Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their study suggested that women had more vascular complications and blood transfusions than men and were more likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility, nursing home, or intermediate care centre (15). A higher IHM in women was also registered in the 2019 study from Lopéz-de-Andrés et al where they stated that females had significantly higher IHM irrespective of all the comorbid conditions analysed (16). These results differ from some older studies that, after adjustment of the results, did not show a significant difference in IHM and suggest that there is no greater than a 2.5-fold increase in risk for females compared with males undergoing AVR.…”
Section: Savr: In-hospital and 30-day Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Studies have shown that the risk profile and baseline conditions for women and men undergoing the SAVR procedure is different (15,16). Compared with men, women are typically older and have more non-atherosclerotic comorbid conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) and anaemia, but a lower prevalence of coronary and peripheral arterial disease (PAD), renal disease, cerebrovascular disease and prior sternotomies (15,16). This supports the findings of other studies that SAVR is generally used in lower risk patient groups and may explain why this procedure is more commonly used in men (28).…”
Section: Differences In Risk Profiles For Male and Female Patients With Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, after AVR, women suffer significantly more than men from in-hospital and 30-day morbidity and mortality ( 3 – 10 , 13 , 21 23 ). However, although the short-term outcomes are worse, female patients have shown better long-term outcomes with higher survival rates ( 6 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 16 , 26 32 ) known as the sex paradox.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-medical factors influencing medical care include regional differences, education, socio-economic status, and ethnicity 10 18 . Regarding sex differences, there are reports of poorer postoperative outcomes in women with cardiovascular diseases and cerebral infarctions 11 , 13 . In ophthalmology, the poorer baseline findings at the initial treatment of female patients have been reported for diabetic macular edema and age-related macular degeneration 19 , 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%