Gender differences in HIV-related stigma in Kenya

Abstract

Stigma associated with HIV/AIDS directly and indirectly drives HIV transmission. We examined how factors associated with HIV-related stigma differed by gender, using data from the 2008-2009 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS). Descriptive, bivariate and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted on selected HIV-related stigma indicators for men and women. Bivariate analyses showed significant gender differences in the overall HIV Stigma index with a higher proportion of women than men presented at the highest stigma level (4.9% vs 2.7%, p < 0.01). Women were more likely to express higher stigmatic attitudes for all components of stigma measured than men. Multivariate analyses showed that HIV-related knowledge had significant inverse dose-response for both men and women. For instance, compared to women in the first HIV-related knowledge quartile, a 1 unit increase in HIV-related knowledge among women at the third HIV-related knowledge quartile was expected to lead to a 63.8% decrease in HIV-related stigma (95% CI [0.21, 0.63]) for women with high stigma, 57.8% decrease for similar women with medium stigma (95% CI [0.33, 0.55]) and 28.4% decrease for those with low stigma (95% CI [0.57, 0.90]). Acceptance with the statement "a husband is justified to hit or beat his wife if she refuses to have sex with him" was a significant risk factor for expression of stigmatising attitudes at all levels for women (High: OR = 1.49, 95% CI [1.02, 2.17]), Medium: OR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.18, 1.82], Low: OR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.10, 1.73]) and men at medium stigma (OR = 2.02, 95% CI [1.38, 2.95]). Other notable gender differences were found in employment, marital status, ethnicity, region of residence, wealth and media exposure. Our results showed that women in the general Kenyan population had higher stigmatic attitudes than men. This was associated with differences in risk factor profile and confirmed previous literature on complexity of social-cultural factors associated with HIV-related stigma.

Prevalence of opportunistic infections in HIV-positive patients in Bahrain: a four-year review (2009-2013)

“…Male sex was a risk factor for both having HIV infection and for the occurrence of AIDSassociated OIs (male-to-female ratio was 5:1). This was not the case in other parts of the world, such as sub-Saharan areas of Africa [14]. This may be due to the increased incidence among males of unsafe sex and drug abuse compared to females in Bahrain and the late seeking of medical advice in male patients.…”

Prevalence, trend and risk factors for antiretroviral therapy discontinuation among HIV-infected adults in Ethiopia in 2003-2015

“…Part of the reasons for this could be due to: (i) HIV related stigma which is known to be higher in females than in males, and prohibits them out from HIV care seeking [58, 59]; (ii) Lower literacy status in females than males, which is a big challenge that prevent women from optimising the benefit of HIV care [60], (iii) higher usage in females than males of traditional healers which hinders females from taking ART consistently [61], and (v) lack integration between modern and traditional medicines which has been identified as one of the key factors in for a consistent uptake of ART programs in Ethiopia [62]. Similar to findings by Meloni and colleagues[63], discontinuation was higher among patients with immunological failure than their comparator.…”

HIV Treatment Scale-Up and HIV-Related Stigma in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Longitudinal Cross-Country Analysis

“…We also found that HIV-related stigma in the general population appeared to be more prevalent among women than among men, perhaps reflecting gender differences in HIV-related knowledge, formal education, socioeconomic standing, and personal experiences with PLHIV. 59 Thus, it remains evident that additional interventions to reduce HIV-related stigma—such as educational campaigns, 31 changes to laws or policies that institutionalize stigma, 14 and livelihood interventions 24 —will be needed and that such interventions may need to be tailored to reflect gender differences.…”