2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2010.5673666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in freshman engineering students' identification with engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies indicate that gender disparities in representation within engineering may be related to differences in self-efficacy (e.g., Marra, Rodgers, Shen, & Bogue, 2009), interest (e.g., Inda, Rodriguez, & Pena, 2013), levels of exposure to engineering before college (Pierrakos, Beam, Watson, Thompson, & Anderson, 2010), and peer or student-faculty relationships (Amelink & Creamer, 2010). Curricular emphasis was the most distinguishing factor related to engineering major choice between genders in Zafar's (2009) single-institution study, a result similarly produced in a study by Knight et al (2012) conducted across multiple engineering programs and institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies indicate that gender disparities in representation within engineering may be related to differences in self-efficacy (e.g., Marra, Rodgers, Shen, & Bogue, 2009), interest (e.g., Inda, Rodriguez, & Pena, 2013), levels of exposure to engineering before college (Pierrakos, Beam, Watson, Thompson, & Anderson, 2010), and peer or student-faculty relationships (Amelink & Creamer, 2010). Curricular emphasis was the most distinguishing factor related to engineering major choice between genders in Zafar's (2009) single-institution study, a result similarly produced in a study by Knight et al (2012) conducted across multiple engineering programs and institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional details on specific themes and trends uncovered using the online survey are presented in [14].…”
Section: Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interviews used a semi-structured protocol, and the online survey was developed to facilitate triangulation with the interview data. The questions posed in these interactions were designed to examine students' influences and appeal in choosing engineering as a major, knowledge and perception of the field of engineering, level of preparedness for engineering studies, and sense of belonging within engineering [12], [14]. The methods employed for investigations on problem-based learning included focus groups with a total of 37 students (5 female, 32 male) who were enrolled in the first offering of the Introduction to Engineering course in the spring semester 2009.…”
Section: Research Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work has established that many activities related to the professional aspects of engineering positively impact engineering-related outcomes; those activities include building things, taking things apart, programing, playing computer games, or just being interested in how things work (Pierrakos, Beam, Watson, Thompson, & Anderson, 2010). For example, some of these activities (including playing games like Tetris) are particularly helpful in the development of 3-D spatial skills, which are important for engineers (Cherney, 2008;Sorby, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%