2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Fecal Immunochemical Test Performance for Early Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(49 reference statements)
4
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we evaluated a wide range of cut-offs from a positivity threshold of ≥10  μ g/g (≥50 ng/mL). In comparison to previous studies using a ≥10  μ g/g cut-off [31, 36] (positivity rate: 8.4%–9.6%), our overall positivity rate was higher at 13.6%. This is potentially due to a higher prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in our population or variations in the FIT brand used, which has previously been shown to affect FIT performance [42], although this was not demonstrated in a recent meta-analysis [28].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we evaluated a wide range of cut-offs from a positivity threshold of ≥10  μ g/g (≥50 ng/mL). In comparison to previous studies using a ≥10  μ g/g cut-off [31, 36] (positivity rate: 8.4%–9.6%), our overall positivity rate was higher at 13.6%. This is potentially due to a higher prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in our population or variations in the FIT brand used, which has previously been shown to affect FIT performance [42], although this was not demonstrated in a recent meta-analysis [28].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…This is potentially due to a higher prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in our population or variations in the FIT brand used, which has previously been shown to affect FIT performance [42], although this was not demonstrated in a recent meta-analysis [28]. As anticipated, when comparing our PPV results for CRC and HRAs to previous studies [30, 31, 36, 37], the pattern of increasing PPV for CRC and HRAs with increasing FIT cut-off was reproduced. An unfortunate limitation of the literature is the variability in the definition of HRAs, which has hindered the feasibility for meta-analysis [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Most of these programs use population-average thresholds of fecal hemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) to define test positivity (2, 3) while some adjustments have been made by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (4,5) or cost-effectiveness analyses (6,7). It should be noted that age-/sex-specific variations in the f-Hb have been shown in previous studies (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Two other studies likewise found a higher sensitivity of FIT for advanced neoplasia in men compared with women (6,7), and also a higher positive predictive value (PPV), whereas FIT specificity in men was found to be significantly lower (6). The lower specificity in men was confirmed in the FIT screening trial CORERO-1 with a higher FPR in men compared with women (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The PPV for advanced neoplasia did not differ significantly for men (42.1%) and women (37.0%; P ¼ 0.265). Positivity rates, detection rates, and the PPV at higher cutoffs can be found elsewhere (8).…”
Section: The Corero Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%